Evaluation of the effectiveness of combined treatment of coronary heart disease – coronary artery bypass grafting, transplantation of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction . Despite resounding success in treatment of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), researchers are yet unable to significantly reduce mortality in this disease. With this in mind, there are ongoing studies everywhere, which are aimed at investigating new techniques in order to boost the efficiency of existing standards. One of such promising techniques is cell/regenerative therapy with autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (ABMMCs). However, even though ABMMCs have been studied for more than 10 years, there are no unambiguous data yet on several issues. Objective : to evaluate the outcome of ABMMC transplantation during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in combined treatment of CHD. Materials and methods . The data of 408 patients admitted to the clinic from 2013 to 2016 for planned surgical treatment of CHD were analyzed. The work included 117 people based on the design of the study. Patients were randomized in 3 groups: Group 0 (control group) – CABG surgery and intramyocardial injection of 0.9% NaCl solution, Group 1 – CABG surgery and intramyocardial injection of ABMMCs, Group 2 – CABG surgery, intramyocardial and intra-graft injection of ABMMCs. The dynamics was assessed 12 months later – functional class of angina pectoris and heart failure, echocardiography, speckle tracking (assessment of the degree of myocardial deformation), treadmill test, 6-minute walk test, daily ECG monitoring, quality of life questionnaires, coronary angiography. Qualitative indicators were calculated using the Pearson’s chi-squared test and Fisher criteria. Quantitative indicators were calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon tests. Factor analysis was used to identify certain severity factors and to study data homogeneity. Discriminant analysis was performed to investigate the leading characteristics that determine differentiation between the groups. For analysis of variance, taking into account various factors, the model of variance analysis for dependent samples – Repeated Measures ANOVA – was used. Results . In the observation groups, an improvement in both systolic and diastolic myocardial function was universally noted. A six-minute walk test showed statistically significant increase in Groups 1 and 2 compared with the control Group 0 – 315.06 ± 17.6 (433.54 ± 20.6), Group 1 – 319.8 ± 24.5 (524.4 ± 28.7), Group 2 – 329.9 ± 25.3 (452.7 ± 29.7) meters. A significant decrease in the functional class of exertional angina pectoris in Groups 1 and 2 was noted unlike in the control group. The percentage of functioning coronary shunts after a 12-month follow-up period was 87.6% in Group 0. In Groups 1 and 2, this ratio was 96.2% and 97.3%, respectively. Predictors of overall effectiveness were identified: smoking, initial diastolic myocardial dysfunction, left ventricular ejection fraction. Conclusion . In addition to surgical treatment of coronary heart disease, ABMMC transplantation can improve myocardial contractility, boost exercise tolerance, and increase the duration of the functioning of coronary shunts at the follow-up period of 12 months. The study showed the need for stage-by-stage analytical calculations with the aim of possible correction of further work.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».