The Importance of Long-Term Follow-up after Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery: Durability of Results and Tumor Recurrence
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) has become the preferred surgical approach for resection of pituitary adenomas in most centers. This technique has a series of advantages such as improved visualization and maneuverability when compared with microscopic transsphenoidal approach. However, long-term results are still scarce. Ten years ago, we published our initial series with short-term results. This project aims to revisit the results of that series, assessing now the long-term results regarding radiological recurrence of pituitary adenomas. Methods: Retrospective analysis of consecutive, endoscopically managed pituitary adenomas in a single center from 2004 to 2007. Only patients with >5 years of follow-up (FU) were included in this study. Results: A total of 98 patients matched the inclusion criteria for this study. The median follow-up period was 144 months. Nonfunctioning adenoma was the most common subtype ( n = 66, 67.3%), followed by GH-secreting tumors ( n = 19, 19.4%), ACTH-secreting tumors ( n = 7, 7.1%), prolactinomas ( n = 4, 4.1%), and TSH-secreting adenomas ( n = 2, 2%). Age ranges from 23 to 82 years, with median age of 53 years. Preoperative visual deficits were observed in 46 patients (46.9%) and hormonal deficits were identified in 31% of cases. 22.4% of patients had undergone a previous pituitary adenomas resection prior to treatment in our center. Surgery achieved gross total resection (GTR) and near-total resection in 86 cases (85%; 50 and 35%, respectively). A total of 37 cases had recurrences during FU (mean recurrence free survival: 80 months). Recurrences were observed in 32% of patients who had had GTR, with mean RFS of 87.25 months, while recurrences were observed in 41.9% of patients who underwent near-total or partial resection (mean RFS = 69.22 months). Most recurrences occurred after 5 years of FU (23 cases <63% of all recurrences) and only four cases had recurrences in the first 2 years after surgery. Surgery and/or radiation were done for management of recurrences in 29/37 cases. Cavernous sinus invasion and cases that had undergone previous surgery were significantly associated with shorter RFS, among which recurrent case was most significantly associated in multivariate analysis ( p = 0.05). Conclusion: Long-term FU analysis demonstrates that progression/recurrence of previously resected adenomas is observed in a significant number of patients, especially in those in whom GTR was not achieved. Short-term FU may shadow real tumor control rates achieved after ETS and therefore, long-term FU should be pursued in all cases.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».