Effects of early discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy (EDAC) and the timing of treatment on outcomes in patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer (ESPC): Result from a population-based retrospective cohort study.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
694 Background: Although evidence suggests that a delay in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) results in inferior outcomes in some cancers, little is known about its detrimental effects in patients with ESPC. Moreover, it is not known if EDAC has been associated with high risk of recurrence and poor survival. The current study aims to determine association between timing and completion of AC and outcomes in ESPC. Methods: Patients with ESPC who were diagnosed from Jan 2007 to Dec 2017 and underwent complete resection in the province of Saskatchewan were examined. Kaplan Meier methods and log rank tests were performed for survival analyses. Cox proportional multivariate analyses were performed for correlation with recurrence and survival. Results: A total 168 patients with ESPC were identified. 97 (57%) patients were excluded as they did not receive AC, were found to have metastatic disease, did not have curative surgery or had received preoperative chemotherapy. Of 71 eligible patients with median age of 69 years (IQR: 57-73), 52% were male, 31% had WHO performance status of 0 and 92% had a comorbid illness. 78% had pancreatic head tumor, 66% had T3 tumor and 63% had node-positive disease. Median time to start of AC from surgery was 73 days (IQR: 59-89). 32% were started AC within 60 days of surgery. 89% received single-agent chemotherapy and 25% received adjuvant radiation. 69% completed planned treatment. Median time to recurrence in group which completed treatment was 22 months (95%CI:15.8-28.2) vs. 9 months (3.3-14.7) if treatment was discontinued early (P < 0.001). Median overall survival of the group that completed treatment was 33 months (17.5-48.5) vs. 16 months (17.5-48.5) if it was stopped early (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, EDAC was significantly correlated with recurrent disease (HR = 3.0; 1.6-5.5), P = 0.0001 and inferior survival (HR = 3.2; 1.68-6.12), P < 0.001. No correlation between AC timing and survival was noted. Conclusions: Although timing of AC does not correlate with inferior outcomes, EDAC has been associated with high risk of recurrence and inferior survival in ESPC.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».