Abstract P3-08-52: Systemic toxicities of trastuzumab-emtansine predict tumor response in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: The plant alkaloid Maytansine and its derivatives with anti-microtubule activity failed in early trials due to significant toxicity.When linked to trastuzumab as an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), emtansine can be delivered directly into the target cell with little systemic toxicity since the emtansine is inactive before the linker of the ADC is cleaved inside the tumor cells. Systemic toxicities with trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) include thrombocytopenia and transaminase elevations, unlike trastuzumab alone. We hypothesized that systemic toxicities of this ADC are in part the result of emtansine released from the lysed tumor cells, and if so, that they may predict its tumor response. To evaluate this hypothesis, the correlation between early toxicity and initial tumor response, as well as progression free survival, are examined in a retrospective multi-center study. Methods: Records of women with metastatic or locally advanced/inoperable HER2+ breast cancer who received at least one dose of T-DM1 were retrospectively abstracted from 3 centers with IRB approval. Eighty-two patients were identified. Nine were excluded—one due to a diagnosis of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and eight due to lack of follow-up imaging after starting T-DM1. Platelet count, AST, and ALT results from baseline up to the 8th cycle were graded with the NCI CTCAEv5.0 toxicity scale and grades were summed as a toxicity score for the 73 evaluable patients. Sequential CT or PET/CT response to therapy were defined by RECIST criteria with the addition of a mixed response category. Results: A significant association between improved ordinal imaging response (complete, partial, stable, mixed, progression) and higher toxicity sum score was observed by the Jonckheere-Terpstra two-sided test (Z=-2.194, p=0.028). 66% of the progression free patients (29/44) had toxicity sum scores ≥2 compared to 45% with disease progression (13/29), Z=-1.89, p=0.059 by two-sided Cochran-Armitage Trend Test. Progression free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with toxicity score ≥ 2 compared to score ≤ 1, p = 0.012 by log-rank test. Further, longer PFS was significantly associated with higher toxicity sum score with HR= 0.67 (β= -0.418, SE(β) = 0.169, χ2 = 6.08, d.f.=1, p = 0.014) indicating a 33% decrease in hazard of progression for each one-point increase in toxicity score. Discussion: This small, retrospective study demonstrates a significant association between higher toxicity sum score and more favorable tumor response as well as progression free survival in women with metastatic or locally advanced/inoperable HER2+ breast cancer treated with T-DM1. Further study in large-scale trials is warranted to confirm this association and determine the clinical utility of toxicity score as a predictor of therapeutic response. Our finding does not exclude systemic toxicity from the possible ADC linker cleavage prior to endocytosis. However, when T-DM1 was studied in the metastatic setting, 48% of patients experienced a Grade 3 or higher adverse event leading to dose reductions or discontinuation of the drug in 19% and 10% of patients, respectively. In the adjuvant setting, with only residual tumor that can account for ADC-related tumor lysis, only 25% had a Grade 3 or higher adverse event leading to 18% of patients discontinuing the drug. Should our observation prove predictive in further studies, it may have ramifications for many more antibody-drug conjugates. Citation Format: Shou-Ching Tang, Carter Louis Capra, Germame H Ajebo, Simon Mairs, Judith Meza-Junco, William B. Hillegass, Barbara S. Craft, Xiaofu Zhu. Systemic toxicities of trastuzumab-emtansine predict tumor response in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-52.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».