MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3005655675 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p5-12-06

Abstract P5-12-06: Non-adherence to endocrine therapy is associated with a significant increased risk of local recurrence in women ≥65 years with stage T1N0 breast cancer treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone after breast-conserving surgery

2020· article· en· W3005655675 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Mira Goldberg, Rinku Sutradhar, Lawrence Paszat, Timothy J. Whelan, Sumei Gu, Cindy Fong, Eileen Rakovitch

Notice bibliographique

RevueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMale Breast Health Studies
Établissements canadiensHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversitySunnybrook Health Science CentreJuravinski Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBreast cancerPopulationOncologyInternal medicineCancer registryMastectomyCohortAnastrozoleAdjuvant therapyStage (stratigraphy)GynecologyBreast-conserving surgeryCancerTamoxifen

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: Clinical guidelines recommend that for women ≥65 years with stage T1N0 breast cancer (BC) treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) that breast RT may be omitted and treatment with ET alone is acceptable. However, population-based studies report that up to two-thirds of women with T1N0 BC do not complete 5 years of ET. The effect of non-adherence to ET on recurrence risks in women treated with ET alone is unclear. We established a contemporary population-based cohort of women aged ≥65 years with stage T1N0, hormone receptor positive, breast cancer treated with single modality adjuvant ET or RT alone. We examined the effect of non-adherence in those treated with ET alone and compared the outcomes (ipsilateral LR, any breast event and any invasive in-breast event) of women who were non-adherent to those who were adherent to ET or those treated with RT alone. Methods: A population-based cohort of women diagnosed with T1N0 BC from 2010-2016, aged ≥65 years at diagnosis, treated with BCS and single modality adjuvant therapy with RT alone or ET alone was identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry. ER-/PR-, ER unknown/PR unknown, HER2+ cases and those without sentinel node biopsy or axillary dissection were excluded. Treatment and outcomes were ascertained using deterministic linkages of administrative databases. Receipt of adjuvant ET was identified using dispensing records from the Ontario Drug Benefit Claims database. Adherence percentage at any specific time was calculated by dividing the number of days dispensed (up to that time) by the number of days since diagnosis. This was updated every 3 months for each woman receiving ET. Adherence to ET was captured as a 3-level time-varying covariate (RT only, <80% ET adherence, ≥80% ET adherence). Patients were censored at the time of recurrence. Differences in recurrence risks were compared by Chi-square test. Multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age was used to evaluate risks of ipsilateral LR, any in-breast event (ipsilateral or contralateral, DCIS or invasive) and any first invasive in-breast recurrence. Results: The cohort includes 1551 women; 1054 women treated with BCS + adjuvant RT alone and 497 treated with BCS + adjuvant ET alone. The median follow-up time was 5 years. Almost half (45.7%) of cases prescribed ET alone were <80% adherent. For those who were followed for 5 years, 35% of follow-up time was spent non-adherent to ET. The 5-year risk of LR was 5.8% in patients treated with ET alone who spent <80% of time adherent to ET, 0.4% in patients treated with ET alone who were >80% adherent and 0.9% in those treated with RT alone (p<.001). The 5-year risk of any in-breast event was 6.6% in women <80% adherent, 0.7% in those adherent to ET and 3.2% in those treated with RT alone (p=.001). Women treated with ET alone who were <80% adherent during their follow-up time had a 5-fold increased risk of LR (HR=4.93, 95%CI: 2.13, 11.42, p=0.0002), a 1.6 fold increased risk of any breast event (HR=1.65, 95% CI: 0.89, 3.07, p=0.11) and a 1.6 fold increased risk (HR=1.68, 95% CI: 0.87, 3.25, p=0.13) of any invasive in-breast event compared to those treated with either RT alone or compared to those who were >80% adherent to ET. There was no significant difference in outcomes between those treated with ET who were >80% adherent during their follow-up time and those treated with RT alone. Conclusions: Almost half of women older than 65 years with stage T1N0 breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant ET alone are <80% adherent to ET. Non-adherence to ET is associated with higher risks of local recurrence compared to those treated with adjuvant RT alone. Adjuvant approaches incorporating RT may be preferable to ET alone. Citation Format: Mira Goldberg, Rinku Sutradhar, Lawrence Paszat, Timothy Whelan, Sumei Gu, Cindy Fong, Eileen Rakovitch. Non-adherence to endocrine therapy is associated with a significant increased risk of local recurrence in women ≥65 years with stage T1N0 breast cancer treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone after breast-conserving surgery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-06.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,157
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,311

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,063
Tête enseignante GPT0,357
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2020
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCancer ResearchMême sujetMale Breast Health StudiesTravaux en français237 207