The Effect of Scapular Dyskinesis on Upper Quarter Y-Balance Test Performance
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Upper Quarter Y-Balance Test (UQYBT) is a functional assessment tool that measures the stability and mobility of the upper extremity, while also analyzing symmetry. Scapular dyskinesis is defined as an alteration of the positioning and function of the scapula that impacts the overall kinetic chain, inhibiting proper shoulder movement. This condition is most prevalent in athletes participating in overhead sports such as swimming and tennis. Scapular dyskinesis decreases the range of motion of the shoulder resulting in a weakened performance. While it is unknown whether scapular dyskinesis is a cause or effect, it is believed that it increases the risk for shoulder injuries to occur. PURPOSE: to investigate if scapular dyskinesis impacts the performance on the UQYBT. METHODS: Twenty subjects (23±5 years; 76±17 kg; 173±10 cm), eight females and 12 males, participated in this study. Scapular dyskinesis was assessed using the Kibler Scapular Dyskinesis Test (SDT), on all subjects. Once the SDT was completed, the subjects performed the Upper Quarter Y-Balance Test (UQYBT). The three reach directions of the UQYBT are medial reach (MR), superolateral reach (SLR), and inferolateral reach (ILR). Three consecutive trials in all three directions were performed on the right and left arm, randomly. A one-minute resting period was given for each subject between trials. The best reach score for each direction and side was collected and normalized to the right upper extremity length. Composite scores were then calculated using the average of the three reach directions, for each side. One-way ANOVA analyses were used to compare the normalized reach scores for each direction, between the shoulders with scapular dyskinesis and the normal, p<.05. RESULTS: Out of the 40 shoulders tested in this study, 15 shoulders were categorized as having scapular dyskinesis and the other 25 were categorized as normal. No significant differences were found when comparing all three normalized reach scores and normalized composite score between scapular dyskinesis shoulders and normal shoulders, p>.05. For the normal shoulders, %MR was 98.4±7.9%, %SR was 73.1±13.5%, %IR was 81.1±12.8%, and %composite was 84.2±8.95%. In terms of the scapular dyskinesis shoulders, %MR was 95.6±8.9%, %SR was 69.9±13.9%, %IR was 83.8±12.6%, and %composite was 83.1±10.5%. CONCLUSION: In all three reach directions and composite scores, the scapular dyskinesis shoulders were observed to have similar results when compared to the normal shoulders. These results may indicate that subjects with scapular dyskinesis shoulders are able to achieve similar scores due to compensatory patterns of the muscles surrounding the shoulder girdle complex and thorax. Further research needs to be done to investigate if there are different compensatory mechanisms in individuals with scapular dyskinesis shoulders.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».