MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3006799248 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keaa032

Successful lung transplant in rapid progressive interstitial lung disease associated with anti-melanoma differentiation associated gene 5

2020· article· en· W3006799248 sur OpenAlexaff
Kun Huang, Robert D. Levy, J. Antonio Aviña‐Zubieta

Notice bibliographique

RevueLara D. Veeken · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Établissements canadiensResearch CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInterstitial lung diseaseLungMelanomaLung diseasePathologyLung transplantationInternal medicineCancer research

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Successful lung transplant can be achieved in anti-MDA5 DM patients with RP-ILD requiring ECMO. Sir, Anti-melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 (MDA5) has emerged as an important myositis-specific antibody that is seen in 10–35% of patients with DM [1]. Patients with anti-MDA5 antibody are more likely to have clinical amyopathic DM (CADM), a term coined to describe absent or minimal muscle disease, and to have increased risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD) [2]. Asian patients with anti-MDA5 have higher frequency of ILD and especially rapid progressive ILD (RP-ILD) leading to high mortality up to 50–60% within 6 months [2]. Western literature has conflicting data on anti-MDA5 association with RP-ILD [1, 3]. Here we present a case series of four anti-MDA5 DM patients with RP-ILD on mechanical ventilation who successfully underwent bilateral lung transplantation. This report was approved by Vancouver Coastal Health and University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board (H18-03216). Individual patient consent is waived by the institution. Vancouver General Hospital is the single transplant centre in the province of British Columbia, Canada. From 2014 to 2018, we had a total of 18 cases of confirmed anti-MDA5 DM in British Columbia. RP-ILD was found in nine patients. Four patients with RP-ILD were initiated on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and received double lung transplants, after maximal immunosuppressive therapy and prolonged mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure. All four patients had very aggressive lung disease and required intubation within 2–4 months from first symptom onset. They all had typical DM rash and some had ulcerative skin lesions. Three of the four patients were amyopathic. Their cutaneous and muscular clinical features at presentation are summarized in Table 1. Clinical courses of the four anti-MDA5 DM patients with RP-ILD who had successful lung transplant Myositis antibody testing was done with line immunoassay (Euroimmun GmbH, Lübeck, Germany). CK: creatine kinase; CMV: cytomegalovirus; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; F:females; IV CYC: intravenous CYC; GC: glucocorticoid; M: males; MMF: mycophenolate; PE: pulmonary emboli; Tac: tacrolimus; RP-ILD: rapid progressive interstitial lung disease; RTX: rituximab; UGIB: upper gastrointestinal bleed. Clinical courses of the four anti-MDA5 DM patients with RP-ILD who had successful lung transplant Myositis antibody testing was done with line immunoassay (Euroimmun GmbH, Lübeck, Germany). CK: creatine kinase; CMV: cytomegalovirus; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; F:females; IV CYC: intravenous CYC; GC: glucocorticoid; M: males; MMF: mycophenolate; PE: pulmonary emboli; Tac: tacrolimus; RP-ILD: rapid progressive interstitial lung disease; RTX: rituximab; UGIB: upper gastrointestinal bleed. All four patients survived the transplant and eventually were discharged in a stable condition. One patient (no. 3) passed away from infectious complications 14 months after transplant. At the time of final follow-up (range from 12 to 32 months), the other three patients had no recurrent cutaneous disease and enjoyed normal muscle strength. Patient 1 had normal pulmonary function test while patients 2 and 4 had mildly restrictive lung function. All were on room air living independently in the community. The clinical courses of these patients are summarized in Table 1. To our knowledge, this is the first and largest case series describing successful lung transplantation in anti-MDA5 DM patients with RP-ILD while on ECMO support. We recently published a case series of 21 Canadian anti-MDA5 DM patients [3]. Prior to this study, successful lung transplants in anti-MDA5 DM-associated RP-ILD were reported in two cases only. The first case was a 52-year-old Japanese female who received a left lower lobe from her daughter and a right lower lobe from her son within 15 days of hospitalization. She remained well on immunosuppression (not specified) [4]. Most recently, Karolinska clinicians reported a 38-year-old Caucasian man who had a successful lung transplant after failing glucocorticoid and CYC [5]. This patient remained well in remission at 12 years’ follow-up. Two other case reports also demonstrated excellent transplant outcome in DM-associated RP-ILD, one with anti-Jo-1 [6] and the other with an unknown antibody profile [7]. Evidence for treatment outcomes of RP-ILD associated with anti-MDA5 is scarce and based on case reports only. A recent multicentre prospective study from Japan showed that an early combined regimen of high-dose glucocorticoid, tacrolimus and intravenous CYC improved survival significantly to 89% at 6 months, compared with 33% from the traditional step-up regimen group (i.e. glucocorticoid first and stepwise addition of immunosuppressants) [8]. Although the aggressive immunosuppressive combination is more effective, patients with this disease still face high mortality, at least in Asians [8]. Traditionally, the outcomes of lung transplantation in patients requiring pretransplant ECMO were poor, which reflected the severity of the pretransplant condition as well as further decondition while receiving ECMO. Therefore, understandably, transplant clinicians tend to reserve scarce lung resources to those not on ECMO. Furthermore, there are considerable concerns of theoretical recurrence of ILD in the transplanted lungs secondary to the underlying connective tissue disease. However, in our case series, ECMO bridging to lung transplant was the only life-saving intervention for those who further deteriorate from hypoxia despite maximal immunosuppression and mechanical ventilation support. It is important for clinicians to be aware of ECMO as a modality to bridge to lung transplant as it is not available in many centres globally. In three of the four patients, we have long-term data confirming no recurrent lung disease after lung transplant. This is the largest case series demonstrating successful lung transplant can be achieved in patients with RP-ILD secondary to anti-MDA5 DM requiring ECMO for oxygenation. Based on our local experience, we recommend consulting a transplant team early for assessment. Following transplant, maintenance therapy with glucocorticoid, mycophenolate and tacrolimus, for both transplant anti-rejection and autoimmune ILD, seems appropriate. We thank Drs Kamran Shojania, Roland Nador and John Yee for the excellent care to the patients included in this study and constructive feedback on the manuscript. Funding: No specific funding was received from any funding bodies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors to carry out the work described in this manuscript. Disclosure statement: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueLara D. VeekenMême sujetInflammatory Myopathies and DermatomyositisTravaux en français237 207