A123 GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS AND DISORDERS OF GUT BRAIN INTERACTION ARE COMMON IN PATIENTS WITH EHLERS-DANLOS SYNDROME (EDS) IN TERTIARY REFERRAL CENTER
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is a group of rare connective tissue disorders. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, bloating and altered bowel habits are common in patients with EDS. Specifically, disorders of gut brain interaction (DGBI) appear to be more common in this patient population. The University Health Network (UHN) has the first and only multi-disciplinary clinic, including specialized gastroenterology services, in Canada for the management of EDS. Aims The aim of this study is to describe the GI symptoms and DGBI that are present in our cohort of EDS patients. Methods A retrospective chart review of all EDS who were seen in the gastroenterologist clinic of the GoodHope EDS clinic at UHN were reviewed from November 1, 2017 to September 26, 2019. Demographic information including age, sex and EDS subtype were collected. GI symptoms that were collected include constipation, diarrhea, fecal incontinence, nausea, vomiting, bloating, abdominal pain, early satiety, heart burn, dysphagia and regurgitation. A physician made diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) was recorded. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results The charts of 79 EDS patients were reviewed; 4 were excluded due to missing data. 75 patients were included in the final analysis. 93.3% of patients were female with a mean age of 36.4 +/- 12.5 years. Of these 75 patients, 43 (57.3%) had EDS-hypermobile subtype, 13 (17.3%) EDS-classic, 3 (4%) EDS-vascular, 3 (4%) unknown EDS subtype and 13 (17.3%) were categorized as having a hypermobile spectrum disorder. The most common GI symptoms observed in this patient group included abdominal pain in 85.5%, bloating in 64.4%, heartburn in 61.8%, constipation in 57.9%, nausea in 50%, diarrhea 43.4%, dysphagia in 43.4%, regurgitation in 34.2%, early satiety in 32.89%, vomiting in 30.2%,and fecal incontinence in 13.1%. It was also observed that 50.7% (n=38) had a physician made diagnosis of IBS. Of these patients with IBS, 16 (42.1%) had IBS constipation, 12 (31.5%) had IBS mixed, and 10 (26.3%) had IBS diarrhea. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that GI symptoms are common in patients with EDS. In our cohort, abdominal pain is the most commonly reported GI symptom, though other various GI symptoms are also reported in high numbers. DGBI are also common, with IBS being much more common than what has been reported in the general population. Further studies are needed to better understand the pathophysiology and impact of these GI symptoms and DGBI in patients with EDS. Funding Agencies UNH Foundation Goodhope Fund
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».