A93 HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA SCREENING IN PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS FOLLOWED BY A GASTROENTEROLOGIST- A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF HEALTHCARE QUALITY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines recommend screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in adults with cirrhosis every six months by abdominal ultrasound. This recommendation stands for patients with Child-Pugh A / B cirrhosis or Child-Pugh C who are on the transplant waiting list. The rationale behind this guideline is that surveillance for HCC has been shown to improve overall survival. However, in previous studies, rate of adherence to screening was suboptimal. Aims The goal of this study was to define the screening rate in our medical center while collecting demographic and descriptive data (Table 1). Methods We performed a monocentric retrospective study of healthcare quality. Adult patients who had a diagnosis of HCC between July 2010 and February 2018 and who were previously followed in gastroenterology for cirrhosis were included. The delay between the last abdominal imaging available and the first imaging that raised suspicion for or made the HCC diagnosis possible was calculated for each patient. Screening was considered appropriate if it was less than 8 months. Results 102 of the 170 patients had to be excluded from the study because their cirrhosis wasn’t clearly documented before the HCC diagnosis (Figure 1). Amongst included patients, 52% (95% confidence interval 0,39-1,00) had received an appropriate screening for HCC.The average size of HCC at diagnosis was 37 mm and 53% had multicentric distribution. 56% of patients received treatment, with chemoembolization being the most frequently used in our population. 49% and 80% of patients had passed away at 1 and 3 years post-diagnosis, respectively. 52% of patients had normal alpha-feto-protein (AFP) initially. Conclusions Although limited in statistical power by the size of its sample, our study still sheds an interesting light on the reality of HCC screening in a Canadian hospital. The rate of appropriate screening, although suboptimal, is comparable to those reported in the literature elsewhere in the world. The dark prognosis associated with this disease is also illustrated. The proportion of patients who were excluded from the study due to occult cirrhosis highlights the importance of establishing this diagnosis so that screening recommendations can be put into practice. Further studies of larger scale would be needed to assess the causes of screening issues. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».