The Jury in Ukraine: topical issues of reform
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article is devoted to the analysis of the current state of the jury in Ukraine, assessment of existing problems in legislative regulation, ambiguity of enforcement and finding possible ways of solving existing problems. The jury's ability to defend the judicial system against some tendencies that take place in the trial corps and can undermine a fair system of criminal liability and punishment is argued. A statistical analysis of criminal and civil cases involving jury in 2017-2018 is provided. The article emphasizes that the successful functioning of the jury depends first and foremost on the procedure of selection of people for jury. The bill drafts of Ukraine of amendments to the current legislation on improvement of the procedure of forming the list of jury are analyzed. In the context of this, attention was paid to the issues of the quantitative composition of the jury, the transfer of power to form a list of jury to State Judicial Administration of Ukraine, the heterogeneity of the composition of the jury in terms of individual and psychological differences. The expediency of working out the Regulation “On the procedure of selection of citizens in the jury”, where all requirements for candidates for jury will be detailed, restrictions for people to be sworn, the procedure of forming the lists of jury and their submission to court, is stated. The outreach campaign and legal education of the population is аn important element of the effectiveness of the jury. The requirement of continuity of the trial in the case of jury which is related to the concentration of their attention and various kinds of influence, in particular the mass media, is emphasized. It is noted that the review of the decisions of the jury in the appeal court by professional judges, in fact, negates the value of the verdict of the jury.The item of allotments to candidates for jury and the experience of foreign countries on this issue are considered. It also substantiates the demand of transition of Ukraine to the classic jury trial model, which successfully operates in such developed countries as the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Belgium and others. The introduction of a classic jury trial model is absolutely necessary in the current condition, will increase the public's confidence in the judicial system and will introduce an effective competitive model of criminal proceedings. Key words:jury, verdict of the jury, selection of the jury.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle