A95 DO BENIGN LIVER TUMOURS ALWAYS STAY BENIGN? A CASE REPORT OF HEPATIC INFLAMMATORY PSEUDOTUMOR AND SUBSEQUENT CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Hepatic inflammatory pseudotumors (HIPTs) are rare, benign lesions of unclear etiology which can be challenging to diagnose and differentiate from malignant processes. The optimal treatment and follow up of these lesions is controversial, and literature exists to support both surgical resection as well as conservative medical management. The natural history of HIPTs is generally benign, however there are some reports of disease recurrence, and two reports of malignant transformation to lymphoma. Aims To describe a case of HIPT with progression to malignancy. Methods Case report and review of the literature. Results A 53-year-old male presented to St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton in August 2019 with a three-week history of abdominal pain and distention. He had a previous diagnosis of HIPT, incidentally found on ultrasound four years earlier. CT in January 2016 reported two well-marginated focal liver masses with peripheral rim enhancement and central hypodensity, 3.9 x 3.9cm in segment 2, and a 6 x 4.6cm central lesion, as well as diffuse fatty infiltration of the liver. Bloodwork showed a mildly elevated Ca19-9 626 kU/L, and normal CEA and AFP. Two biopsies were performed in 2016, both demonstrating dense fibrous tissue and abundant chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate composed of lymphocytes, histiocytes, eosinophils, and plasma cells, with some areas of bland spindle cell proliferation. No malignant cells, and histology was felt to be consistent with HIPT. MRI in September 2017 showed progression of disease, prompting Rheumatology to initiate immunosuppressive medications, however serial imaging continued to show increase in the size and number of lesions. Upon presentation to hospital in August 2019 ultrasound showed new ascites, with ascitic fluid analysis reporting highly atypical cells with prominent nucleoli of uncertain origin. CT showed extensive intrahepatic lesions throughout both lobes of the liver, and tumor markers were elevated with Ca19-9 16,581 kU/L, CEA 10 ug/L, Ca125 511 kU/L, and normal AFP. Repeat liver biopsy reported adenocarcinoma, likely cholangiocarcinoma, with background cirrhosis. Medical oncology did not feel he would tolerate chemotherapy, and he was thus discharged home with palliative supports. Conclusions HIPTs are benign lesions that are often initially misdiagnosed as malignancy, however this is the first case reporting progression of HIPT to cholangiocarcinoma. It is unclear if HIPT itself has premalignant potential, or whether its presence delays diagnosis of subsequent de novo malignancies. Given these uncertainties, as well as the lack of clarity on optimal management of HIPT, this case illustrates the importance of long-term clinical and radiographic follow up of these uncommon lesions, with consideration of repeat biopsy if the disease is not following the expected clinical course. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».