A160 THE EFFECT OF AN INSTRUCTIVE VIDEO ON THE BOWEL PREPARATION EXPERIENCE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Over 26000 new cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) are diagnosed each year in Canada. This number has been decreased significantly by the implementation of CRC screening that includes removal of any polyps found during colonoscopies. Despite this, approximately 1 in 4 colonoscopies are inadequate for the detection of early neoplasms due to insufficient bowel preparation prior to the colonoscopy. Consequently, there is a need to improve patient adherence to the bowel preparation protocol. Previous research has shown that enhanced education, including the methods and rationale for bowel preparation prior to a colonoscopy, improves the quality of the bowel preparation. Aims We hypothesised that patients with access to a replayable video explaining the bowel preparation protocol and its importance would have increased satisfaction and noninferior bowel preparations. Methods 100 patients undergoing programmatic screening colonoscopy were randomly assigned into one of two groups. The control group was given the standard presentation currently given to patients. The experimental group was given the same presentation and also given access to an educational video. This video is based on Alberta provincial bowel preparations which have been tested and evaluated. Participants in both groups were sent a survey one day after their colonoscopy. Subjects completed a modified version of the Outpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey with added questions designed to assess their satisfaction with the education they received on the bowel preparation. Bowel preparation quality was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale by the endoscopist. Results 17 participants (10 female), aged 40–72 (Mage = 60) have enrolled in the study thus far; however, most have yet to have their colonoscopy. Initial results revealed that all participants had high levels of satisfaction with the presentation they were given. Those in the control group indicated that they would have liked to have had access to a video guide to the bowel preparation before their procedure. The participant in the experimental group indicated high levels of satisfaction with this video, noting that it provided important information not available from other sources. Information on the quality of their bowel preparations is pending. Conclusions The use of multimedia explanations of the bowel preparation has promise in improving patient satisfaction with the bowel preparation. Further studies may guide best methods for implementing a video assisted educational model to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Funding Agencies The first author received an Edna Wakefield Rowe Memorial Summer Research Award from the Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry at the University of Alberta to support this work.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».