MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3008216766 · doi:10.5040/9781474207775.0073

North America, 1513–1830

2018· other· en· W3008216766 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
W. Barksdale Maynard

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArchaeology and Natural History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistoryGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

After touching land in Florida in 1513, Spain seemed likely to conquer North America, but instead other major European powers jockeyed for control of the continent, with Britain taking the lead by the late seventeenth century. France came to hold Canada, but Britain also made territorial gains there, too. Rapid population growth followed waves of immigration from Europe, and increasing wealth and self-confidence led the Thirteen Colonies to make a bid for independence in 1776 as grievances grew with the British Crown and the taxation policy. The United States, as it was now constituted, expanded rapidly after the American Revolution ended in 1783, enjoying prosperity from trade, farming and manufactures, which a canal-building boom further fostered in the 1820s. By the early nineteenth century, its population was soaring. However, the economy of the Southern states was dependent on slavery, with millions of Africans being forcibly transported across the Atlantic in a triangular trade led by Britain. US Congress’s 1820 Missouri Compromise drew a free-North/slave-South division across the territories and settled, at least for a time, the perilous question of whether to abolish slavery. North American architectural culture emerged out of British precedents and continually looked to Britain for guidance, even as a greater sense of America’s unique cultural identity began to coalesce. Neoclassicism in public buildings was seen as a pathway to improved public taste. Architectural revivals eventually dominated the scene, pushing aside those long-familiar Classical modes that expressed themselves in North America as Georgian and Federal. Greek and Gothic Revivals became popular, increasingly adorned with sculpture as an aesthetic embellishment. Critics called for better, more durable and more handsome buildings in US cities. Philadelphia, with its marble banks, was considered the architectural model, whereas fast-growing New York had far to go. Although not a professional architect, Thomas Jefferson, President from 1801 to 1809, did much to promote better design, whether in his house at Monticello (1769–1809) or for the University of Virginia (1826). As Secretary of State, Jefferson, along with Pierre Charles L’Enfant, had helped lay out Washington, DC and select the plans of major public buildings. Neoclassical style also became increasingly popular for tasteful homes in the Southern states and elsewhere. The eastern half of the North American continent was dominated by forests, so wooden construction prevailed to an extent unknown in most of Europe. Timber-framed architecture thus became the American hallmark. Brick and stone were put to use locally, and stone architecture became more common once quarries were opened widely after 1800. The introduction of European-style stone vaulting brought a new sense of scale and permanence to American architecture, a promising step towards fireproof construction on a continent plagued by urban conflagrations. Building types multiplied, from the many churches demanded by Protestant sects, to capitol buildings for an ever-growing number of US states, to banks and prisons. The Georgian style of architecture emerged around 1700, practised by skilled craftsmen-builders and gentlemen amateurs. Taste changed abruptly after the American Revolution, with the coming of Federal style derived from the Adamesque in Britain. Fine commercial buildings and mansions graced cities like Baltimore, Boston and Philadelphia, with other centres such as New York growing apace. US colleges proliferated as campus-based architecture, often including Neo-Gothic quadrangles. The first professional architects appeared on the scene by 1800, namely Benjamin Henry Latrobe and Charles Bulfinch: the first an immigrant from England, the latter native-born. But both also faced financial hardship, and it was not till later in the nineteenth century that the profession flourished.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,862
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,275

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,002
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0270,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetArchaeology and Natural HistoryTravaux en français237 207