A182 LAST RESORT – RESOLVING REFRACTORY UPPER GI BLEEDS WITH ENDOSCOPIC APPLICATION OF FIBRIN GLUE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Endoscopic assessment of gastric bleeding is essential for timely investigation and evaluation in attempting to resolve bleeds. Increasingly, endotherapy is used to stop bleeds to prevent the patient from progressing to surgery. The tools available for the endoscopist can be broadly broke into injection sclerotherapy, mechanical tamponade, thermal methods and Hemospray©. Each method has their own inherent advantages and disadvantages with indications for use. Aims Unfortunately, patients fail despite standard endotherapy and would then be subjected to surgical procedures. Fibrin glue injection has been selectively described in case reports to resolve recalcitrant bleeds. We have reviewed endotherapy cases by one surgeon where fibrin glue was used to resolve recalcitrant upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a variety of clinical presentations. The goal was to show that endotherapy application of fibrin glue can be used to resolve challenging GI bleeds. Methods A retrospective review was made from one surgeon records of endoscopic bleed resolution with fibrin glue from 2010 to 2018. Indications for the procedure were gastric bleeds in hospital, emergency department, or undergoing endoscopic procedures that resulted in a heavy bleed. Patients were categorized as high risk using the Rockall score and those with known ulcers ertr graded as Forest Ia. The patients were of a variety of ages, sex, and had differing co-morbid medical conditions. The fibrin product used was Tisseel which is a two-component fibrin sealant and was deployed using a standard endoscopic Injection sclerotherapy needle. Results In all but one of the patients, hemostasis had been reached by delivering fibrin glue by endoscopy. The patient that failed treatment had multiple co-morbidities and the bleeding source was a gastric bed of venous malformations. Patients were followed up with next day scoping to confirm bleed hemostasis. No adverse reactions were noted. Conclusions Studies have shown in the past that fibrin glue has worked in achieving hemostasis and had a lower rate of re-bleeding. There are several advantages to using the biological process of the clotting system. The fibrin mat will stay localized and not spread into the lesion. Fibrin injection also creates the natural meshwork of normal biological healing. This naturally compress the mat meshwork along the wound and promote hemostasis. Fibrin glue can also be re-applied in the case of a site re-bleed. Treating endoscopically can beneficial in that patients may not need to progress to the risks and recovery times of surgery. Utilizing the biological process of the body allows for natural repair and degradation of the clot. The procedure is well tolerated and had showed no side effects in this review. Our findings support the use of fibrin glue injection endotherapy as a last resort before surgical intervention. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».