A Stitch in Time: Embracing My Limits as a Medical Learner
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor: Many believe that physicians are perfect, all-knowing beings. Despite having heard about clinical errors through news media, I also subscribed to this belief, and, consequently, carried a philosophy of perfection into my first clinical observership as a medical student. The physician I shadowed, a family doctor operating in a rural community, occasionally asked me about the patients’ cases, and I felt accomplished when responding correctly to the questions she fired. Then, she threw a curve ball. The next patient was a child who cut his leg, and the physician enthusiastically prompted me to suture the wound. For some, suturing a one-inch cut might be banal. For me, it was daunting. In all my three weeks of medical school, I had not yet learned about suturing. I was clueless, yet refusing seemed unviable. The family physician continued pointing the needle driver toward me, repeating that it was an easy procedure, something that I should know how to do. As I reached for the needle driver, I looked to the boy, finally noticing his terrified expression. I was so preoccupied with my own thoughts that I had neglected the patient. He deserved my honesty. He deserved quality care. My throat unfroze, and the words finally flowed: “I don’t feel comfortable doing the sutures. I’ve never done it before … but I would appreciate if I could watch how you would do this.” I waited for the physician’s reply. How incompetent are you? Are you really a medical student? You should know this already! You should consider another profession! I braced myself for the harsh criticism, but it never came. Instead, the physician apologized for assuming that I was comfortable with treating the patient and started explaining what to do. This was my first instance (of many) of admitting my inability to perform a task. Despite the family physician’s understanding words, I felt frustrated and embarrassed. However, it was these emotions that ultimately prompted me to improve my knowledge. Later that week, I began watching YouTube video tutorials on suturing techniques, and I registered for an upcoming surgical skills workshop. I believe that physicians have an innate desire to seek perfection, but no one is born knowing how to perform a cardiac exam or how take a social history. We all need first experiences to learn and grow, and admitting our limitations is essential for discovering our starting points. Jeffrey Lam Shin CheungFirst-year medical student, University of Toronto Medical School, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; [email protected]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,140 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,016 | 0,023 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,022 | 0,040 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».