A151 ASSESSMENT OF CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY UTILIZING CAPSOCAM PLUS® IN PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED SMALL BOWEL DISEASE INCLUDING PILOT STUDY WITH REMOTE ACCESS PATIENTS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely utilized for the assessment of patients with known/suspected small bowel disease. The CapsoCam Plus® capsule is unique in that it utilizes four cameras at sequential 90 degree intervals in its mid-section permitting a 360-degree panoramic perspective with a 15+ hour battery life. A panoramic view has been suggested to improve overall visualization of the small bowel (SB) therefore potentially improving diagnostic yield. Unlike other small bowel capsules, it must be retrieved upon excretion (utilizing a magnetic kit) since the images are stored on the device. Aims To assess the use of CapsoCam Plus in patients referred for suspected small bowel disease, including pilot assessments for patients in remote locations. Methods A retrospective chart review (01/16 – 09/19) assessing consecutive capsule procedures utilizing this device was performed. Information acquired included basic demographics, indication, extent of examination, gastric transit time, small bowel transit time, yield, adverse events, capsule retention, recovery rates and recommendations for follow up. A pilot study was also initiated for patients in rural centers to access capsule testing remotely through mail courier without attendance/travel to the primary dispensing site. Results Acquired data included 63 patients receiving CapsoCam Plus®. Indications: 32% obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, 52% iron deficiency anemia, 2% abdominal pain and 6% for IBD. 92% of studies were completed to cecal visualization. Mean gastric and small bowel transit time were 0:48:17 and 3:54:29. 94% were retrieved using retrieval kits provided to patients. 2% retrieved endoscopically from the stomach (retained due to pyloric stenosis), 2% retained in terminal ileum (previously undiagnosed stricture) and 2% not retrieved due to failure of patient to use retrieval kit. 73% of studies were normal SB, 13% contained SB ulceration/erosive disease and 8% did not demonstrate the entire small bowel. Recommendations for follow up included supportive therapy (47%), more aggressive iron supplementation (1%), repeat capsules (19%) and 14% for routine office follow up and discussion. All three capsules mailed to patients in remote communities were completed successfully. Conclusions CapsoCam Plus® had a high retrieval rate of 97% demonstrating that with appropriate patient selection, recovery rates are very high. Only 3% of patients had retained capsules. Most patients in this study had a normal small bowel, however; images and completion rates were adequate to assess small bowel in the vast majority of patients. Success was obtained with mailing this capsule to remote sites sparing the patient travel to the dispensing site. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».