MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3008827791 · doi:10.2215/cjn.11921019

Association of APOL1 Risk Genotype and Air Pollution for Kidney Disease

2020· letter· en· W3008827791 sur OpenAlexaff
Ishan Paranjpe, Kumardeep Chaudhary, Manish Paranjpe, Ross O’Hagan, Sayan Manna, Suraj K. Jaladanki, Arjun Kapoor, Carol R. Horowitz, Nicholas DeFelice, Richard Cooper, Benjamin S. Glicksberg, Erwin P. Böttinger, Allan C. Just, Girish N. Nadkarni

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2020
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Établissements canadiensInstitute of Population and Public Health
Organismes subventionnairesNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
Mots-clésMedicineGenotypeDiseaseEnvironmental healthAir pollutionKidney diseaseInternal medicineGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Significant disparities exist in kidney disease, with blacks facing a higher burden of CKD and kidney failure. In addition to socioeconomic/health system factors, these disparities are linked to two sequence variants (G1 and G2) in the apoL1 (APOL1) gene. The high-risk APOL1 genotype (two copies of variants), present in up to 16% of blacks but <1% of Europeans (http://apol1.org/), is associated with an increased risk for CKD (1,2). However, the APOL1 high-risk genotype has incomplete penetrance and only some individuals with the high risk genotype develop overt kidney disease, indicating the presence of genetic/environmental modifiers (i.e., “second hits”). Thus, investigations into nontraditional/emerging risk factors are necessary to explore what modifies genetic risk. Air pollution measured by fine particulate matter <2.5 µm (PM2.5) is an emerging robust risk factor and CKD/kidney failure risk increases linearly with PM2.5 (3). We hypothesized that like other chronic diseases, environmental risk (PM2.5) interacts with genetic risk (APOL1) to increase kidney disease. We utilized a large, biobanked cohort (BioMe Biobank at Mount Sinai) with linked genetic, clinical, and residential history information to reconstruct environmental exposures. We included 4800 participants self-identifying as black enrolled at a large, quaternary care health system in New York City serving an urban population from all boroughs and New Jersey. The mean age was 51 years, 63% were women, 29% had a history of type 2 diabetes (T2D), and 62% had a history of hypertension. APOL1 high-risk genotype was defined as two risk variants and low-risk genotype was defined as one or zero risk variants. We mapped the residences of participants to city blocks and estimated average PM2.5 exposure in the year before enrollment, using a previously developed model combining satellite-derived aerosol optical depth retrieval with land use, meteorology, and spatially derived features (4). Finally, we identified CKD stage 3 or higher using a validated algorithm (5), and kidney failure using US Renal Data System linkage over follow-up. We defined a composite kidney outcome as either CKD stage 3 or higher or kidney failure (Figure 1).Figure 1.: Study methodology and APOL1 interaction for CKD risk. (A) Flowchart of methodology used in this study. (B) Proportion of CKD/kidney failure stratified by APOL1 genotype with higher average PM2.5 exposure in the year before enrollment. Shaded gray regions represent 95% confidence intervals obtained from a logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, 10 genetic principal components, history of type 2 diabetes, Medicaid status, and baseline eGFR. For purposes of visualization of the slopes, the values of continuous predictors are computed at the cohort mean of each covariate. Frequency distribution at top represents the distribution of mean PM2.5 in our cohort. NASA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration; PC, principal component; PM2.5, fine particulate matter <2.5 µm; T2D, type 2 diabetes.Of 4800 blacks with 5.4 median follow-up years, 675 (14%) had APOL1 high-risk. There were 1286 blacks with the composite outcome and 293 with kidney failure; 253 (37%) individuals in the APOL1 high-risk group and 1033 (25%) in the low-risk group had the composite kidney outcome. Compared with low-risk APOL1 individuals, high-risk APOL1 individuals had a significantly lower eGFR at enrollment (75 versus 82 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P<0.001), higher proportion of kidney outcome (37% versus 25%; P<0.001), and hypertension (66% versus 61%; P=0.03). We evaluated statistical significance using the chi-squared test and t test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. There were no significant differences in BMI (31.3 versus 30.7; P=0.08), age (51 versus 51 years; P=0.45), sex (63% versus 63% female; P=0.98), T2D (31% versus 29%; P=0.43), or PM2.5 (12.1 versus 12.2 μg/m3; P=0.61) concentrations between APOL1 high- and low-risk. We investigated the APOL1–PM2.5 interaction using a logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, ten genetic principal components, Medicaid status, T2D, and enrollment eGFR with an APOL1–PM2.5 interaction term to generate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). First, there was a significant association with outcome for PM2.5 and APOL1 individually. We found an increased aOR of 1.07 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.15; P=0.02) for every 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 and 1.12 for APOL1 high-risk (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.16; P=1.3×10−11). We also found a significant interaction between PM2.5 and APOL1 (P<0.001). In individuals with APOL1 high-risk, we observed increased aOR of 1.54 (95% CI, 1.32% to 1.80%; P=1.1×10−7) for every 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5. In contrast, in APOL1 low-risk, we found an increased aOR of 1.11 of kidney outcome (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.17; P=1.9×10−4) for every 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5. Thus, slope of PM2.5 exposure for APOL1 high-risk is steeper than that for low-risk individuals, suggesting a multiplicative interaction (Figure 1B). This suggests that, although both PM2.5 and APOL1 independently increase kidney disease in blacks, the effect of PM2.5 is worse in APOL1 high-risk individuals. Thus, although APOL1 high-risk genetically predisposes individuals for kidney disease, environmental exposures may serve as a second hit that accentuates this. This may partially explain the incomplete penetrance of APOL1 wherein interplay between genetic and environmental factors influence kidney risk. Limitations include lack of replication, complete personal exposure data, enrollment albuminuria and detailed socioeconomic information. Additionally the cross-sectional nature of our study may not capture the effect of varying PM2.5 exposure over time. Further, as we defined the composite outcome as both prevalent/incident CKD and kidney failure, it is possible that PM2.5 exposure in the year before enrollment contributes more to incident than prevalent CKD. If replicated, it would represent the first example where a common genotype interacts with a common environmental exposure for kidney disease and exacerbates ethnic disparities. In conclusion, in a cohort of 4800 blacks we demonstrated a significant interaction effect between APOL1 high-risk genotype and PM2.5 for kidney disease. Disclosures Dr. Nadkarni is cofounder of and owns equity in Pensieve Health and is a cofounder and member of scientific advisory board of and owns equity and options in RenalytixAI. Dr. Nadkarni also reports receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BioVie, Inc., GLG Consulting, and Reata Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Bottinger, Dr. Chaudhary, Dr. Cooper, Dr. DeFelice, Dr. Glicksberg, Dr. Horowitz, Mr. Jaladanki, Dr. Just, Mr. Kapoor, Dr. Manna, Mr. O’Hagan, Mr. I. Paranjpe, and Mr. M. Paranjpe have nothing to disclose. Funding Dr. DeFelice is supported by grants from National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), and NIEHS Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes. Dr. Just is supported by NIEHS grants P30ES023515 and R00ES023450. Dr. Nadkarni is supported by National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases career development award K23DK107908.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,022

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,325
Écart entre enseignants0,302 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations23
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologyMême sujetRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesTravaux en français237 207