Quantum Distributed Complexity of Set Disjointness on a Line
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Given \( x,y\in \lbrace 0,1\rbrace ^n \) , Set Disjointness consists in deciding whether \( x_i=y_i=1 \) for some index \( i \in [n] \) . We study the problem of computing this function in a distributed computing scenario in which the inputs \( x \) and \( y \) are given to the processors at the two extremities of a path of length \( d \) . Each vertex of the path has a quantum processor that can communicate with each of its neighbours by exchanging \( \operatorname{O}(\log n) \) qubits per round. We are interested in the number of rounds required for computing Set Disjointness with constant probability bounded away from \( 1/2 \) . We call this problem “Set Disjointness on a Line”. Set Disjointness on a Line was introduced by Le Gall and Magniez [ 14 ] for proving lower bounds on the quantum distributed complexity of computing the diameter of an arbitrary network in the CONGEST model. However, they were only able to provide a lower bound when the local memory used by the processors on the intermediate vertices of the path is severely limited. More precisely, their bound applies only when the local memory of each intermediate processor consists of \( \operatorname{O}(\log n) \) qubits. In this work, we prove an unconditional lower bound of \( \widetilde{\Omega }\big (\sqrt [3]{n d^2}+\sqrt {n} \, \big) \) rounds for Set Disjointness on a Line with \( d + 1 \) processors. This is the first non-trivial lower bound when there is no restriction on the memory used by the processors. The result gives us a new lower bound of \( \widetilde{\Omega } \big (\sqrt [3]{n\delta ^2}+\sqrt {n} \, \big) \) on the number of rounds required for computing the diameter \( \delta \) of any \( n \) -node network with quantum messages of size \( \operatorname{O}(\log n) \) in the CONGEST model. We draw a connection between the distributed computing scenario above and a new model of query complexity. In this model, an algorithm computing a bi-variate function \( f \) (such as Set Disjointness) has access to the inputs \( x \) and \( y \) through two separate oracles \( {\mathcal {O}}_x \) and \( {\mathcal {O}}_y \) , respectively. The restriction is that the algorithm is required to alternately make \( d \) queries to \( {\mathcal {O}}_x \) and \( d \) queries to \( {\mathcal {O}}_y \) , with input-independent computation in between queries. The model reflects a “switching delay” of \( d \) queries between a “round” of queries to \( x \) and the following “round” of queries to \( y \) . The information-theoretic technique we use for deriving the round lower bound for Set Disjointness on a Line also applies to the number of rounds in this query model. We provide an algorithm for Set Disjointness in this query model with round complexity that matches the round lower bound stated above, up to a polylogarithmic factor. This presents a barrier for obtaining a better round lower bound for Set Disjointness on the Line. At the same time, it hints at the possibility of better communication protocols for the problem.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle