548 The Economics of Burn Injuries Among Children Aged 0–4 Years
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Children under the age of five years are particularly vulnerable to scalds and contact burns and have the highest rate of hospitalization and mortality from burns. Studies of costs associated with pediatric burns have included a limited number of patients and focused on inpatient and complication costs, limiting our understanding of the full economic burden of pediatric burns, including costs incurred through outpatient care and caregivers’ productivity loss. This study aimed to develop a societal costing model for burn injuries among children aged 0 to 4 years. Methods Children aged 0 to 4 years identified through the local Burn Registry with a burn injury between January 1, 2014 and March 15, 2018 were included in this study. Patients with inhalation injury, electrical, chemical and friction burns were excluded. An incidence-based cost-of-illness analysis with a human capital approach was used to quantify the cost of partial and full-thickness burns according to the percentage of total body surface area (%TBSA) involved. The cost of a burn injury was assessed from a societal perspective through the following cost categories: emergency department visits, inpatient, outpatient dressing changes, outpatient burnbaths, day surgeries, clinic visits and caregiver productivity losses. A list of resource items for each category were extracted from patient chart review, the local Burn Registry, and the local Hospital Finance Database, and assigned unit prices. Costs were discounted to a present value in 2017 dollars at 1.5% per annum. Results Burn injuries were observed for 342 children, of which 249 (73%) had their burn severity classified (%TBSA and partial/full thickness) and were included in this study. Burn severity categories (1–5%, 6–10%, 11–20%, and >20%) were developed based on the differential distribution of the costs allocated to each burn incident. The majority of children (60.8%) suffered from a 1–5% burn. A 1–5%, 6–10%, 11–20%, and >20% burn respectively cost an average of $2,229, $8,653, $13,663, and $98,634 to society. Costs incurred by the 1–5% burns were related mostly to emergency department visits and dressing changes, while costs incurred by the >20% were related mostly to inpatient and clinic visits (garments) costs. Conclusions This costing approach raises awareness about the important, yet preventable economic burden that pediatric burn injuries place on society. Applicability of Research to Practice This evidence may persuade policymakers and clinicians to invest in pediatric burns prevention programs in order to decrease pediatric burns costs allowing for the allocation of funds towards other clinical initiatives. This costing model may also facilitate cost-effectiveness analyses of burn prevention programs in the coming years.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».