772 Psychosocial Impact of a New Peer-support Program at a Burn Center
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction In March 2019, this Burn Center became the 76th active Survivors Offering Assistance in Recovery (SOAR) hospital in the U.S. and Canada. Burn survivors are directly affected by their burn injuries, but so is the survivor’s family, their healthcare staff, and their community. The purpose of this project is to describe our efforts to improve psychosocial care after discharge. Methods The Burn Center’s SOAR peer-support program consists of: 1) group care, 2) individual care, 3) staff care, and 4) community care. Group care consists of weekly peer-support sessions for burn survivors, led by certified SOAR peer supporters/burn survivors, with support from certified SOAR program coordinators. We also host monthly social outings. Individual care occurs when a SOAR peer supporter provides one-on-one support to another survivor. Our burn survivors have historically visited patients in their support of each other’s recovery. We expanded this by teaching survivors an evidence-based approach. Care has been conducted in-person, via phone, social media, and/or through the SOAR webpage. It seems most effective for people who live at a distance from the burn center and who cannot attend weekly sessions. Staff care aims to increase morale and mitigate burnout. Burn survivors, who are deemed psychiatrically stable, are invited to speak to the same staff who took care of them. The intent is to remind staff of the life-saving effect of their daily work, and to instill a sense of meaningfulness. Staff are also invited to attend burn community activities. Community care consists of survivors speaking at various community events to raise awareness and promote prevention. Results At 24 weeks, there have been 931 SOAR encounters: group care (24 group sessions and n=216), individual care (n=55), staff care (4 events and n=212), and community care (7 events and n=448). The weekly groups currently have an average of 10 participants. There are 55 documented individual-care encounters. A common staff theme revolves around regaining a sense of meaningfulness. Qualitative reports show improved mood, community reintegration, anxiety, pain, and rehabilitation. Recent survivors and their families report feeling better connected to the community than those injured years ago. Conclusions There is a desire for the continuation of the Burn Center’s peer-support program. There continue to be new and recurring attendees at our weekly group sessions. Our peer supporters are semi-autonomous and eager to provide individual support. The program coordinators and peer supporters continue to support Burn Center staff. Applicability of Research to Practice Programs such as this are a powerful venue for sharing one’s experiences and for inspiring others on the path of burn recovery.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».