MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3010860334 · doi:10.1111/pbi.13379

Chloroplast genome transformation of medicinal plant <i>Artemisia annua</i>

2020· article· en· W3010860334 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charli Kaushal, Malik Zainul Abdin, Shashi Kumar

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlant Biotechnology Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePlant biochemistry and biosynthesis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaDepartment of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaJawaharlal Nehru University
Mots-clésArtemisia annuaBiologyTransformation (genetics)GenomeGeneticsArtemisininGeneMolecular biologyPlasmodium falciparum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Artemisia annua produces lifesaving antimalarial drug artemisinin. The biosynthetic pathway of artemisinin is intercalated with chloroplasts of A. annua. Therefore, it will be imperative to optimize its chloroplast transformation for increasing the yield of artemisinin, which has not been achieved to desired levels via nuclear genome transformation (Ikram and Simonsen, 2017). The low yield has limited its current global demand for the artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs). For optimizing the chloroplast transformation, species-specific flanking sequences were amplified from the total genomic DNA of A. annua. Vector was named as CP-AA (LF:Prrn16S-g10-aadA-3’UTR-Trps::Ppsba-5’UTRpsba-eGFP-3UTRpsbA:RF) (Fig. 1a), (GenBank Accession # MT096403) was designed in silico and synthesized by vendor (BioBasic Inc., Canada). It was integrated between the intergenic spacer region of rrn16S-trnI and trnA–rrn23S via homologous recombination, without impacting the functionality of other genes (Jin and Daniell, 2015). The aadA (aminoglycoside adenylyltransferase) gene conferring resistance to spectinomycin was codon optimized (GenBank Accession # MT096403). Its expression was regulated by 5’ ribosome-binding site region of the bacteriophage T7 gene10 (Olins et al., 1988) and 3’UTR rps16 from tobacco (NC_001879). The second ORF encodes the enhanced green fluorescence protein eGFP (Zhang et al., 1996) driven by light-regulated PEP promoter psbA, along with 5’ and 3’ UTRs of psbA of tobacco (NC_001879). The eGFP reporter gene was used for early detection of transgenic cultures and optimization of chloroplast transformation (Fig. 1c). Seeds were germinated as described (Alam and Abdin, 2011), and cultures were maintained in light conditions (16h light:8h dark), with 40-50 μmol m-2 s-1 intensity and temp 25 ± 2°C. The pinnately compound, sessile leaves (Fig. 1m), excised from aseptically grown 3-4 weeks old A. annua, were bombarded with 4 µg CP-AA DNA containing ~ 1.35x1011 copies of the plasmid coated on 0.6 µm gold particles (Seashell Technology, La Jolla, CA, USA) using a biolistic DNA delivery system as reported (Kumar and Daniell, 2004; Malhotra et al., 2016). After 48 hours of dark incubation, bombarded leaves were excised into small pieces and placed on selection medium (Fig. 1n). Several independent transgenic shoot primordia were observed after repetitive subculture on every two weeks for 2–3 months on MS medium containing plant growth regulators (1.25 mg/L BAP and 0.05 mg/L NAA) and 500 mg/L spectinomycin (Fig. 1o-p). These primordia were progressively proliferated into distinct shoots after 20 days on MS medium supplemented with reduced spectinomycin (250 mg/L) (Fig. 1q). Transgenic shoots were multiplied and elongated in 3–4 months (subculture after 2 weeks intervals) on MS medium when spectinomycin was reduced to one fourth (125 mg/L) (Fig. 1r). Rooting was induced only in elongated shoots after 5–7 weeks on MS medium containing 125 mg/L spectinomycin and 0.01 mg/L NAA (Fig. 1s-t). Four independent transplastomic plants with proper root were recovered. These plantlets after analysing for transgenes integration by PCR, Southern blot and eGFP protein expression by Western blot analysis were transferred to greenhouse. The transplastomic plants were further clonally propagated as reported (Wetzstein et al., 2018). Transplastomic plants thrive well in the greenhouse, and growth was comparable to WT plants (Fig. 1u). The early-stage transgenic green primordia screening on selection medium (Fig. 1o) was confirmed by eGFP expression (Fig. 1c). The site-specific integration of CP-AA vector cassette into the chloroplast genome was confirmed by primers AA-LF and AA-RF (Fig. 1b) that landed outside the flanking regions (LF-RF), yielding ~4.7Kb PCR amplicon in all transgenic shoot primordia in first round of selection (Fig. 1e). After repeated subculture of transgenic primordia on antibiotic selection, homoplastomic shoots were produced yielding PCR amplicon 4.7 Kb while heteroplastomic shoots also contained a faint signal of 1.8 Kb (Fig. 1f). The gene-specific PCR primers F-aadA and R-aadA; F-eGFP and R-eGFP (Fig. 1b) yielded amplicons ~0.8 Kb (Fig. 1g) and ~ 0.6 Kb (Fig. 1h), respectively, confirming integration of transgenes aadA and eGFP into the chloroplast genome. The homoplastomy status of integrated transgenes was confirmed by Southern blotting. Genomic DNA of transgenics T1-T4 and WT was digested with BamHI. The probe (0.65 Kb) was excised from CP-AA vector for Southern blot hybridization as shown (Fig. 1a). The presence of only ~ 3.5 Kb signal in transgenic plants (T1-T4) and absence of WT chloroplast background (0.9 Kb) has confirmed the homoplastomic status of plants (Fig. 1i). The fluorescent eGFP was used for a preliminary screening to distinguish the transgenics from WT, under the Nikon-A1 confocal microscopy. The eGFP micrographs of transgenics (Fig. 1c) showed auto red fluorescence of chlorophyll (excitation: 565 nm), (left), a green fluorescent micrograph expressing the eGFP (excitation: 485 nm) (middle), and merged micrograph of first two showed the colocalization of GFP expression in chloroplasts (right). Further, localization of eGFP in chloroplast genome was also confirmed by FP-425 primer (land 425 base pair outside the left flank) and R-eGFP primer bind to eGFP gene that yielding ~ 3.2 Kb PCR amplicon (Fig. 1d). For eGFP analysis, total 40 µg protein from transplastomic and WT plants was electrophoresed on 12% SDS-Polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Dyes, yielding a 28 kDa signal only in transgenics lanes (Fig. 1k). The eGFP expression was confirmed by Western blot using a polyclonal GFP antibody conjugated with HRP. About 28 kDa signal was observed in all the four transgenic lines (T1, T2, T3 and T4). No signal was detected in WT lane (Fig. 1l). The maximum transformation efficiency (16.6%) was observed when explants were bombarded using 1100 psi rupture disc at 6 cm distance from microcarrier (Fig. 1j). No transgenics were recovered using rupture discs below 1100 psi or above 1350 psi. The use of 1800 psi rupture disc was deleterious to bombarded explants, causing an internal damage to tissues, leaching phenolic compounds, and cultures died in two weeks after browning. The optimization of chloroplast transformation in agronomically important recalcitrant species is a major challenge due to poor tissue culture response and inhibitory impact of antibiotics on the shoot and root induction in transplastomic tissues (Bock, 2015). In potato, only 3 lines were regenerated out of 104 plates subjected to bombardment, in Arabidopsis, only two transplastomic plants were obtained out of 201 bombarded leaves. In tomato, 3 transplastomic lines were recovered out of 30 leaf samples. However, obtaining a lesser number of chloroplast transgenic should not be a concern as chloroplast transformation is highly site specific via homologous recombination. All transplastomics as well as their clonally propagated plants produced a similar level of artemisinin when compared to WT plants, which indicated that there was no deleterious impact of aadA and eGFP transgenes on plants. In brief, we have optimized a stable chloroplast genome transformation in medicinal plant A. annua, which could be explored further for expressing the non-glycosylated proteins of artemisinin biosynthetic pathway to produce a higher quantity of artemisinin (Malhotra et al., 2016) to meet its global demand for ACTs. This work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India through grant no. ND/DBT/18/017 to SK and UGC-RGN fellowship for PhD provided to CK. We are thankful to Dr. Karan Malhotra for helping in chloroplast transformation protocol and Dr. Srinivasan R., ICGEB, New Delhi for helping in Southern blot analysis. Thanks to Dr. Shalini Agarwal, DST-INSPIRE Faculty, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India for providing GFP polyclonal antibody. The authors declare that they have no competing or conflicting interests. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India through grant no. ND/DBT/18/017 to SK and UGC fellowship to CK. CK carried out the transformation optimization experiments and molecular analysis on transplastomic plants. MZA assisted in interpreting the results, reviewed the study. SK conceptualized the study and supervised the whole experimental research, data and analysis of results. CK and SK interpreted results and wrote the final manuscript. Not applicable. All authors read the manuscript and approved to publish. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article and whole vector description, and DNA sequence information is uploaded to public domain with GenBank Accession # MT096403.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,094
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,702

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,190
Écart entre enseignants0,181 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations27
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePlant Biotechnology JournalMême sujetPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisTravaux en français237 207