Declining future of poultry industry in Balochistan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Pakistan, commercial chicken farming started in 1960s. This sector is playing a vital role in reducing the gap between supply and demand about protein. According to health standards of World Health Organization (WHO), average daily need for animal origin protein is 27g per individual, while in Pakistan it is just 17g daily [5]. Before commercial poultry, desi chickens provided eggs and meat in Pakistan, and produced on average, 0.778kg of meat at age of four months [9] and laid 30 eggs in a period of one year [10]. Almost in mid 1960s Canadian shaver poultry breeding farms and Pakistani airline (PIA) established a commercial hatchery in Sindh province Karachi. Meanwhile, lever brothers of Pakistan established a commercial poultry feed mill in province Punjab at raheemyar khan [5]. Since 1971 to 1980, the poultry sector gained 177%, 271% and 297% total growth in total sum of birds, total chicken meat and total number of eggs, correspondingly [3]. The most significant reason for this progress was a vibrant local market, that enhanced poultry meat consumption more than 4% per year [8]. In spite of showing excellent potential and growth at the completion of years, per capita availability of chicken meat is still 5.1kg and 50 eggs per year in Pakistan, when matched to developed countries these figures are 40.98kg meat and 399 eggs [7]. Certain diseases disturbing poultry segment progress is hydro pericardium syndrome (HPS) occurred in 1990 and caused an enormous damage to broiler and breeder flocks. Similarly in 1991 gumboro appeared -and badly effected broiler, layer and paternal flocks. While the poultry industry was trying to fine -tune itself from the previous HPS and gumboro outbreaks, in 1995 another epidemic of avian influenza occurred in parent flocks at abbottabad and murree farms and resulted up to 80% mortality [1,2]. Due to improvement in chicks prices in 1998 breeding and hatchery companies financially benefited, but in 1999 the poultry sector again suffered because of the appearance of influenza-like ailments (PPA, 2013a). Despite the industry faced reasonable losses during this period, it kept on rising and showed a tremendous growth rate in form of number of birds that increased, overall broiler production and entire number of eggs laid with the growth standards as 98, 126 and 67% [3], respectively. Up to 2004 the poultry business enjoyed excellent growth through good profit margins though, the occurrence of avian influenza [6] in neighboring countries and its rumored spread in Pakistan delayed this growth. Anyway, in the past few years, poultry segment has shown admirable growth and has provided employment to about 1.49 million people [4]. Reports about meat shows that in 1971, marketing contribution of beef, mutton and poultry meat was 61%, 37%, and 2–2.5% respectively [3]. However, reported figures of 2010 about meat are reasonably different where marketing part of beef, mutton and poultry were 55%, 20% and 25%, respectively [3] After fulfilling local consumption requirements, Punjab province sells its surplus poultry food stuff (meat and eggs) to Balochistan and other provinces (Al-Masad, 2010). Because of economical poultry products Punjab poultry sector is able to compete poultry markets of other provinces. Therefore, to minimize dependency on others provinces and encourage economical poultry production, need of a study identifying factors leading to uneconomical poultry production in Balochistan was realized, to inform policy makers about current poultry situation and enable them for economical and profitable future planning regarding poultry production in Balochistan.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».