MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W301253964

Human Rights Types: Separatist to Engaged Religious Variations

2012· article· en· W301253964 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueForum on public policy · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHuman rightsDignityFundamental rightsInternational human rights lawLinguistic rightsSociologyTypologyRight to propertyCultural rightsPoliticsLawPolitical scienceGender studiesAnthropology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Evelyn Kallen, in her Ethnicity and Human Rights (2003) presents a typology of human rights, which includes individual, collective, political, religious, and aboriginal rights, which will be examined, provide a macro-sense of many of the elements and principles which need be studied and considered. These issues have been dealt with in the three major Declarations of Human rights, first by the Americans, followed by the United Nations, and Canadians. These declarations will be briefly examined as well, enhance our insights into these individual, collective, political, economic, religious and aboriginal charters or rights and freedoms, see how nations of the world have set their goals for their interchange of relations. We also plan compare four different cultural groups in Canada (Aboriginals, French, British, Others) illustrate how the Kallen typology applies differently the four groups, creating a mosaic of varied factors, situations and rights, which apply these multicultural and multi-religious situations. I. TYPOLOGY OF HUMAN RIGHTS In Table 1, Evelyn Kallen (1995:10; 2003) summarizes human rights moving from micro individual rights more macro group rights, and then spells out claims of cultural, national and aboriginal rights. She helps sort some of the important categories: 1) Individual rights freedom, opportunity, and dignity; 2) Group or category rights freedom, opportunity, and dignity; 3) Collective cultural rights ethnocultural distinctiveness, design for living, language, religion, institutions, and customs; 4) Collective national rights self-determination, ancestral territory, nation; and 5) Collective Aboriginal rights land, occupancy, and use. All individuals are covered by the first, religious groups by the second, ethnic groups by the third, Quebecois by the fourth and aboriginals by the fifth. Individual rights can be violated by neglect, diminution, oppression, and homicide. Group rights can be violated by inequality, defamation, oppression and genocide, shown by the Jewish Holocaust, and the atrocities in Rwanda, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and now Syria. Deculturation, discrimination, and cultural genocide can be inflicted by those who are dominant, illustrated by European treatment of Canada's aboriginals (Kallen, 1995:10). Collective rights could be violated, if Quebecers decided separate and the rest of Canada denied them nationhood status. Aboriginal rights can be violated when land settlements have not been made, as they have not in half of Canada. We shall examine some of these collective violations of human rights. Beginning with Individual rights, we note that our capitalist economic system, where all need be involved eat, is highly motivated by individual enterprise, considered a sacred right of every person compete, training for a good education compete for jobs. Competition is important, where laws guide individuals, so that conflicts can be held in check, as we strive achieve our goals. The profit motive is central, where expenses are cut, advantages are enhanced make money, leaving the largest margin as accumulations of profits. Capital gains are important enhance income over experiences, as we compete with others make profits. Kallen calls this a right to life, which includes the freedom self-determination, where all have as much equal opportunity as possible, and the profits show that we worked hard, followed the rules and laws, and were among the best who succeeded. It should not be surprising that in this process some over-step the order so that neglect including diminution and oppression of others, and occasional homicides occur. It is a tough system where power is abused by many (Kymlicka and Norman, 2000; Driedger and Halli, 2000). In the process of economic right we of course become part of many groups where we seek more right which illustrates Kallen's second category of fundamental right life. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,961
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,356
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle