MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W301253964

Human Rights Types: Separatist to Engaged Religious Variations

2012· article· en· W301253964 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leo Driedger

Notice bibliographique

RevueForum on public policy · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHuman rightsDignityFundamental rightsInternational human rights lawLinguistic rightsSociologyTypologyRight to propertyCultural rightsPoliticsLawPolitical scienceGender studiesAnthropology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Evelyn Kallen, in her Ethnicity and Human Rights (2003) presents a typology of human rights, which includes individual, collective, political, religious, and aboriginal rights, which will be examined, provide a macro-sense of many of the elements and principles which need be studied and considered. These issues have been dealt with in the three major Declarations of Human rights, first by the Americans, followed by the United Nations, and Canadians. These declarations will be briefly examined as well, enhance our insights into these individual, collective, political, economic, religious and aboriginal charters or rights and freedoms, see how nations of the world have set their goals for their interchange of relations. We also plan compare four different cultural groups in Canada (Aboriginals, French, British, Others) illustrate how the Kallen typology applies differently the four groups, creating a mosaic of varied factors, situations and rights, which apply these multicultural and multi-religious situations. I. TYPOLOGY OF HUMAN RIGHTS In Table 1, Evelyn Kallen (1995:10; 2003) summarizes human rights moving from micro individual rights more macro group rights, and then spells out claims of cultural, national and aboriginal rights. She helps sort some of the important categories: 1) Individual rights freedom, opportunity, and dignity; 2) Group or category rights freedom, opportunity, and dignity; 3) Collective cultural rights ethnocultural distinctiveness, design for living, language, religion, institutions, and customs; 4) Collective national rights self-determination, ancestral territory, nation; and 5) Collective Aboriginal rights land, occupancy, and use. All individuals are covered by the first, religious groups by the second, ethnic groups by the third, Quebecois by the fourth and aboriginals by the fifth. Individual rights can be violated by neglect, diminution, oppression, and homicide. Group rights can be violated by inequality, defamation, oppression and genocide, shown by the Jewish Holocaust, and the atrocities in Rwanda, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and now Syria. Deculturation, discrimination, and cultural genocide can be inflicted by those who are dominant, illustrated by European treatment of Canada's aboriginals (Kallen, 1995:10). Collective rights could be violated, if Quebecers decided separate and the rest of Canada denied them nationhood status. Aboriginal rights can be violated when land settlements have not been made, as they have not in half of Canada. We shall examine some of these collective violations of human rights. Beginning with Individual rights, we note that our capitalist economic system, where all need be involved eat, is highly motivated by individual enterprise, considered a sacred right of every person compete, training for a good education compete for jobs. Competition is important, where laws guide individuals, so that conflicts can be held in check, as we strive achieve our goals. The profit motive is central, where expenses are cut, advantages are enhanced make money, leaving the largest margin as accumulations of profits. Capital gains are important enhance income over experiences, as we compete with others make profits. Kallen calls this a right to life, which includes the freedom self-determination, where all have as much equal opportunity as possible, and the profits show that we worked hard, followed the rules and laws, and were among the best who succeeded. It should not be surprising that in this process some over-step the order so that neglect including diminution and oppression of others, and occasional homicides occur. It is a tough system where power is abused by many (Kymlicka and Norman, 2000; Driedger and Halli, 2000). In the process of economic right we of course become part of many groups where we seek more right which illustrates Kallen's second category of fundamental right life. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,032

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,029
Communication savante0,0080,014
Science ouverte0,0010,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,356
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueForum on public policyMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207