MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3013630572 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p4-12-07

Abstract P4-12-07: Single pre-operative radiation therapy (SPORT) trial for low risk breast cancer: A phase 1 study comparing pathological findings in immediate versus delayed surgery

2020· article· en· W3013630572 sur OpenAlexaff
Marie-Hélène Ngo, David Tiberi, Peter Vavassis, David H. Nguyen, B. Fortin, Mai‐Kim Gervais, Lucas Sidéris, Pierre Dubé, Guy Leblanc, Michel-Pierre Dufresne, Marie‐Christine Guilbert, Michael Yassa

Notice bibliographique

RevueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Établissements canadiensHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBreast cancerPathologicalRadiation therapyCancerBiopsyOncologyInternal medicineBreast-conserving surgeryTumor-infiltrating lymphocytesSurgeryPathologyImmunotherapyMastectomy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers are known to be less immunogenic than triple negative and HER2-positive breast cancers. As increasing levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been associated with increased rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and improved prognosis, there is interest in exploring ways to render ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers more immunogenic. Few studies have analysed the histological response to neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) as the only pre-operative treatment modality; in most case series, chemotherapy was concomitantly given, as these studies focused on the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Aims: The objectives of this study are to assess pathological and immunological responses induced by a single dose of pre-operative RT in early breast cancer. Material and methods: women aged 60 years or older diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma were prospectively identified. Only cT1N0 unifocal tumors that were low to intermediate grade and ER-positive/HER2 negative were eligible. Patients received a single pre-operative radiation dose of 20Gy in a single fraction. Surgery was performed either 24-72 hours after RT (SPORT group) or 11-13 weeks after RT (SPORT -DS [delayed surgery] group). Assessment of pathological response was performed using the Miller-Payne system and Residual Cancer Burden was calculated. Immunohistochemistry for Ki67 was performed on the biopsy and excision specimens. CD8 immunostain was used to evaluate the immune infiltrate. Both groups (SPORT and SPORT-DS) were compared using the independent t-test and Fisher exact test. Results: a total of thirteen patients were included, with an average age of 73 years (range 60-84). All patients received a single 20Gy radiation dose, and surgery was performed either 24-72 hours after RT (SPORT group, n=5) or on average 95 days after RT in the SPORT-DS group (range 75-133 days; n=8). All patients underwent partial mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Histologically, all tumors were invasive ductal carcinomas, except for one invasive micropapillary carcinoma and one invasive tubular carcinoma (both in the SPORT group). Tumor bed changes, similar to what is observed in the post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting, were identified in all but one patients in the SPORT-DS group (7/8 patients) but was not seen in the SPORT group (0/5 patients, p=0.005). Using the Miller-Payne system, there was no evidence of response in the SPORT cohort (grade 1/5 in all patients), while 6/8 patients in the SPORT-DS cohort had a partial pathological response (grade 3/5 in 2 patients and grade 4/5 in 4 patients, p = 0.02). No pCR were observed. Comparing Ki67 on the biopsy and surgical specimens, an average decrease of 7.5% in the SPORT group and 6.3% in the SPORT-DS group was observed (p=0.8). A significant lymphocytic infiltrate was not present in any case (stromal TILs <10% in all cases). At an average follow-up of 11 months, there have been no recurrences. Conclusion: This is, to our knowledge, the first series comparing histological findings from immediate and delayed surgery after pre-operative single dose RT. We observed a significant decrease in tumor cellularity with delayed surgery, while no change in cellularity occurred with immediate surgery. The lack of lymphocytic infiltrate does not support immune activation as the mechanism of the ablative effect of 20Gy of radiation. Further follow-up will be needed to determine the prognostic significance of the partial pathological response that was observed in the SPORT-DS cohort. Citation Format: Marie-Hélène Ngo, David Tiberi, Peter Vavassis, David Nguyen, Bernard Fortin, Mai-Kim Gervais, Lucas Sideris, Pierre Dubé, Guy Leblanc, Michel-Pierre Dufresne, Marie-Christine Guilbert, Michael Yassa. Single pre-operative radiation therapy (SPORT) trial for low risk breast cancer: A phase 1 study comparing pathological findings in immediate versus delayed surgery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-07.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,019

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,199
Tête enseignante GPT0,457
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCancer Research→Même sujetCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→Travaux en français237 207→