Abstract P2-12-07: Vaginal and sexual health of hormone-receptor positive breast cancer survivors on oral endocrine therapy: A cross-sectional study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Tamoxifen and Aromatase Inhibitors (AI) are highly effective forms of oral endocrine therapy (ET) used to prevent recurrences in women with hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer, often with a treatment duration of five or more years. However, the host of side effects women may experience, some related to vaginal health and sexual functioning, greatly impact quality of life (QoL). Those who experience side effects from oral ET are more likely to become non-adherent to their treatment protocol, adversely affecting survival outcomes. Despite this, general communication between cancer patients and their oncologists about sexual health is limited. Few studies have focused specifically on vaginal and sexual health when investigating ET side effects and patient-provider communication in women with HR+ breast cancer. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of vaginal and sexual-related side-effects in women with HR+ breast cancer on oral ET. Secondary objectives were to examine patient-provider communication around sexual health, female sexual dysfunction (FSD), and QoL in this patient population. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study between July 2017 and June 2018 in the outpatient oncology clinic at St. Michael’s Hospital (SMH), a tertiary-care center in Toronto, Canada. English-speaking women with HR+ breast cancer who had a treatment history with Tamoxifen or an AI (Anastrozole, Letrozole or Exemestane) for ≥ 6 consecutive months were eligible to participate. We developed a questionnaire to obtain self-reported information about vaginal and sexual-related side effects, sexual history, and patient-provider communication around sexual health. Two validated questionnaires were also used. Total scores for the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) could range from 1.2 to 36.0, with ≤ 26.55 indicating possible female sexual dysfunction (FSD). Domain scores within the 1-week recall version of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) range from one to eight, with higher scores indicating worse QoL. Additional demographic and clinical variables were collected from electronic medical records. Results: The mean age of the 151 respondents was 56.2 (±10.3), 51.0% of which were receiving Tamoxifen and 49.0% an AI. Ninety-six (63.6%) reported having a current sexual partner, and 71 (47.0%) reported being sexually active. Hot flashes/insomnia (41.7%), decreased libido (32.5%), and vaginal dryness (27.8%) were the three most commonly reported side effects that women experienced “all the time” in the past year. Only 44 (29.1%) women reported ever having been asked about their vaginal and/or sexual health by their oncologist, but 123 (81.5%) reported that they would be comfortable discussing this topic with them. Almost half of participants (68/151, 45.0%) indicated that their current vaginal or sexual-related side effects are not severe enough to want treatment. Thirty-four (22.5%) indicated wanting to know what their options are to best address side effects, 28 (18.5%) would be open to potential treatment for side effects, and 21 (13.9%) would be interested in seeing a physician specialist. Of the 87 women who fully completed the FSFI, 67 (77%) were classified as likely experiencing FSD. The mean score in the MENQOL’s sexual QoL domain was 3.89 ± 2.38 (n = 119), which indicated greater rates of vaginal dryness, avoidance of intimacy, and decreased sexual desire in this group. Conclusion: Our results support the notion that side effect management and patient-provider communication should be prioritized to optimize the vaginal and sexual health of women with HR+ breast cancer receiving oral ET. Women may be unaware of potential treatment options that can help manage side effects accompanying this therapy, and possibly accept these as a new standard of life. Citation Format: Amy Skitch, Alexandra Moskalewicz, Samantha Scime, Rosane Nisenbaum, Ronita Lee, Rashida Haq, Christine Dzerko, Christine Brezden-Masley. Vaginal and sexual health of hormone-receptor positive breast cancer survivors on oral endocrine therapy: A cross-sectional study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-07.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».