MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3013916839 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdaa029

Clinical value of methylation testing: a case report of intraventricular schwannomas with associated molecular findings

2020· article· en· W3013916839 sur OpenAlexaff
Justin Z. Wang, Neda Pirouzmand, Nazanin Ijad, Carlos Velásquez, Andrew Gao, Shirin Karimi, Yasin Mamatjan, Phedias Diamandis, Gelareh Zadeh, Farshad Nassiri

Notice bibliographique

RevueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMethylationValue (mathematics)MedicineInternal medicineBiologyGeneticsGeneMathematicsStatistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Schwannomas are benign nerve sheath tumors arising from peripheral, cranial, or autonomic nerves.1 Intracranial schwannomas represent 6–8% of all intracranial tumors, the majority located in the cerebellopontine angle. Intraventricular schwannomas are rare with only 31 cases reported.2 The wide differential of intraventricular lesions combined with the rarity of intraventricular schwannomas makes diagnosis a challenge, both radiographically and histopathologically. We report on a case of an intraventricular schwannoma and demonstrate how DNA methylation can be used to confirm the unusual diagnosis. A 44-year-old otherwise healthy Caucasian male with a history of migraines presented with a 1-year history of progressive headaches with occasional nausea and gait instability. Neurological exam including cranial nerve exam was unremarkable. Fundoscopy did not show any evidence of papilledema. Gait was grossly normal. There was no family history of any neoplastic disease or known heritable genetic conditions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium showed a 1.7 × 1.4 × 1.2 cm enhancing tumor centered in the lateral ependymal surface of the right lateral trigone with associated vasogenic edema in the periventricular white matter of the right parietal lobe (Figure 1). The medial border of the lesion was associated with the choroid plexus. Gradient echo sequences demonstrated internal blooming without any associated calcifications on Computed Tomography (CT) of the brain. There was no hydrocephalus or additional areas of ependymal enhancement, and no enlargement of the choroid plexus. CT angiogram did not show any direct vascular involvement. The posterior choroidal arteries were not significantly enlarged and there was no evidence for dilatation of the choroidal or internal cerebral veins, decreasing clinical suspicion of a high flow lesion. (A–D) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Enhancing lesion in the lateral ependymal surface of the right lateral trigone measuring 1.7 × 1.4 × 1.2 cm. The medial border is intimately associated with the adjacent choroid plexus. Surrounding vasogenic edema in the periventricular white matter of the right parietal lobe. (A–C) T1-weighted imaging post-gadolinium contrast representative axial, sagittal, and coronal images, respectively. (D) Representative axial T2 FLAIR image demonstrating perilesional edema. (E–H) Postoperative MRI following right parietal craniotomy for tumor resection. A small amount of residual postoperative fluid collection and associated dural thickening adjacent to the craniotomy site shown with the surgical tract leading toward the atrium of the right lateral ventricle. (E–G) Representative axial, sagittal, and coronal T1-weighted imaging post-gadolinium contrast images, respectively. (H) T2 FLAIR image demonstrating a decrease in perilesional edema compared to preoperatively. Differential diagnosis for this lesion was primarily neoplastic in nature and included high-grade glioma, ependymoma, subependymoma, meningioma, choroid plexus tumors, metastases, or schwannoma. We trialed a period of surveillance with radiographic and clinical follow-up over several months, without any documented change in lesion character or size. However, given the patient’s escalating symptoms, lack of diagnosis, and concerning vasogenic edema, surgery was ultimately offered. We performed a right-sided parietal mini-craniotomy and inserted an external ventricular drain (EVD) into the atrium of the right lateral ventricle under stereotactic guidance. The EVD was followed microsurgically into the atrium of the ventricle where the choroid plexus was visualized, and posteriorly, a firm, tan-red-colored mass somewhat adherent to the choroid plexus but not obviously originating from it. We microsurgically devascularized the lesion using bipolar electrocautery and resected it in a piecemeal fashion to achieve a gross total excision. There were no intraoperative complications, and the patient’s postoperative course was unremarkable with a 2-day hospital stay. Postoperative MRI showed near total resection with one small focus of enhancement possibly representing residual tumor. This was stable at 1-year follow-up (Figure 1). Histopathology showed a spindle cell neoplasm with alternating dense interweaving fascicles and looser hypocellular areas (Figure 2A). There were occasional areas of vague nuclear palisading (Figure 2B). Tumor cells had elongated nuclei with mild degenerative atypia (Figure 2C). There was no mitotic activity or necrosis. Vasculature within the tumor was markedly hyalinized and there were abundant perivascular hemosiderin-laden macrophages (Figure 2D). Reticulin stain showed dense pericellular wrapping. Immunohistochemistry showed diffuse nuclear expression of SOX10 (Figure 2E) and cytoplasmic expression of GFAP. EMA, CD34, and neurofilament were negative. Diffuse pericellular staining was seen with collagen IV (Figure 2F). MIB1 labeling index was approximately 1–2%. By histology, the above was in keeping with a WHO grade-I schwannoma. Pathological findings. (A) The tumor was composed of cells arranged in alternating dense fascicles and loose hypocellular areas (asterisks). (B) Areas of vague nuclear palisading were occasionally seen (arrowheads). (C) Tumor cells showed elongated nuclei with mild degenerative atypia. (D) Hyalinized vasculature (arrowhead) and perivascular hemosiderin-laden macrophages (arrows) were identified. (E) On immunohistochemistry, the tumor showed diffuse nuclear staining with SOX10 and (F) diffuse pericellular staining with collagen IV. Scale bars = 100 µm. Given the unusual location for a schwannoma, molecular testing of the tumor was sought for confirmation of the diagnosis. Eight unstained slides of paraffin-embedded tissue were used as samples and DNA was extracted and subjected to DNA methylation profiling (Infinium MethylationEPIC Kit) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Raw methylation data were subjected to classification using a recently developed and validated methylome-based CNS tumor classification model.3 The top-ranked diagnosis was schwannoma (Figure 3A). Chromosomal copy number variation profile generated from raw methylation data did not demonstrate any large-scale alterations, in keeping with the diagnosis of schwannoma as opposed to other pathologies in the differential diagnosis (Figure 3B). Loss of chromosome 22 was not identified. Using unsupervised hierarchical clustering approaches, the tumor sample most closely resembled schwannomas when strictly compared to other tumors in the differential diagnosis (meningiomas, gliomas, and choroid plexus tumors; Figure 3C and D). Taken together, the above molecular analysis provided confirmation of the histological diagnosis of schwannoma. Results of DNA methylation profiling analysis. (A) The top score from the DKFZ classifier v11b4 (Molecular Neuropathology, Heidelberg, Germany) suggests methylation class schwannoma as the most likely diagnosis based on methylation signature. (B) Chromosomal copy number variation profile generated from raw methylation data did not demonstrate any large-scale alterations, in keeping with schwannoma. (C and D) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering approach demonstrates that the tumor sample most closely clustered with schwannomas (vestibular and spinal) when strictly compared to meningiomas, gliomas, and choroid plexus tumors included. IDH_MUT, isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant; IDH_WT, isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype; SS, spinal schwannoma; VS, vestibular schwannoma. Intraventricular schwannomas are rare entities with only 31 prior cases reported worldwide.2 The majority are located in the lateral ventricles (63.6%) with the rest in the fourth (27.3%) and the third (9.1%) ventricles. There have been 2 reported cases of “malignant schwannomas” that recurred early after subtotal resection with intracranial metastasis despite adjuvant radiotherapy.4,5 For benign intraventricular schwannomas, total resection was curative and was achieved in 25 of the 31 cases. Even those with a subtotal resection did not demonstrate any recurrence at 10 years, suggesting close radiographic surveillance may be appropriate if the pathology does not demonstrate malignancy.2,6 There are several theories regarding the pathogenesis of intraventricular schwannomas. Benedikt7 described the association of Schwann cells with peripheral or autonomic nerve fibers located within the choroid plexus of the ventricle. These Schwann cells can undergo a neoplastic transformation and become benign or malignant schwannomas. Another theory suggests that ectopic debris from neural crest cells that migrate into the ventricular system during disorganized or abnormal embryogenesis can also undergo neoplastic transformation.8 These theories may explain the close anatomic association of these tumors with choroid plexus in several previous reports, as well as in our own case. A final theory suggests that pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells from the subventricular zone may differentiate into Schwann cells following tissue injury, such as in multiple sclerosis, post-stroke, and other pathologies.9,11 All previous diagnoses of intraventricular schwannomas have relied entirely on histology and immunohistochemistry. Recent revisions of the WHO classification in 2016 integrate molecular alterations with histopathological changes for specific tumors. For schwannomas, the diagnosis remains entirely histopathological. We previously established the molecular landscape of schwannomas and have shown that DNA methylation profiling identifies schwannoma subgroups based on anatomical location (primarily vestibular versus spinal schwannomas).12–,14 In our unsupervised analysis, we included known cases of choroid plexus tumors (papillomas and carcinomas), gliomas (IDH-mutant and wildtype), meningiomas, and schwannomas (cranial/vestibular and peripheral) to determine the similarity of this case’s methylation profile to known entities. Overall, although our analysis included relatively few cases of cranial versus peripheral schwannomas compared to previous studies, we found this tumor most closely resembled tumors of vestibular origin. However, future studies are needed to determine if intraventricular schwannomas represent a new methylation subgroup with different tumor biology and mutational landscape. Our case demonstrates the clinical utility of DNA methylation profiling in brain tumor classification and highlights how epigenome-wide DNA methylation analysis can be leveraged as an additional tool to improve brain tumor classification using modeling approaches, particularly for challenging brain tumors in rare locations, with discriminative capabilities reaching 99%.3,15 No funding was allocated for this work. J.Z.W., N.P., N.I., C.V., S.S., A.G., P.D., and F.N. prepared the text and figures. F.N., S.K., and M.Y. provided the methylation data. J.Z.W., F.N., S.S., N.P., N.I., and G.Z. edited the clinical portions. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,336
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueNeuro-Oncology AdvancesMême sujetNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesTravaux en français237 207