MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3014292345 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000000934

Atherosclerosis of Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Causing Embolic Ocular Events

2020· letter· en· W3014292345 sur OpenAlexaff
Lili Tong, Michael K. Lee, Edward Margolin

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2020
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAmaurosis fugaxFundus (uterus)Ophthalmic arteryCentral retinal artery occlusionOptic nerveRetinal Artery OcclusionGlaucomaOphthalmologyRadiologyStenosisRetinalBlood flow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Embolic disease to the eye often indicates carotid artery disease. Although most of the time the culprit is atherosclerotic disease in the common carotid arteries in the neck, we describe 2 cases where the embolic source was intracranial carotids. CASE 1 A 55-year-old man with past medical history of Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia noticed gradually worsening vision in the right eye (RE) for the past 2 months. Examination demonstrated one peripapillary hemorrhage and several plaques in the retinal circulation RE. Carotid Doppler ultrasound was interpreted as normal. Referral to his family physician for evaluation of thromboembolic source was made on an elective basis. He subsequently developed ocular pain and was referred to our service. Visual acuity was hand motions RE and 20/30 left eye (LE) with right relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). Intraocular pressures were 28 and 11 mmHg. There was iris neovascularization visible on biomicroscopic examination RE. Funduscopy demonstrated pale right optic nerve with associated retinal whitening, box-carring of the retinal arterioles and several peripapillary hemorrhages (Fig. 1A). Diagnosis of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS) complicated by neovascular glaucoma was made. Echocardiogram, Holter monitor and brain MRI were unrevealing, but brain and neck computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) demonstrated high-grade stenosis of the right intracavernous internal carotid artery (ICA) and moderate stenosis of the distal right ICA (Fig. 1B).FIG. 1.: A. Fundus photo of the right eye demonstrating optic nerve pallor and severe arteriolar attenuation and nonperfusion. B. Computed tomography angiography image, coronal view through cavernous sinus, demonstrating severe stenosis of the right intracavernous carotid artery (blue arrows).CASE 2 A 58-year-old man complained of transient vision loss 3 times in the previous 2 months in his RE only. The peripheral visual field tunneled down to a small central island surrounded by complete blackness over the course of seconds and returned after approximately 5 minutes. He denied pain, headache, jaw claudication, weight loss, anorexia, and arthralgias. Past medical history was significant for depression, migraine with aura, systemic lupus erythematosis, coronary artery disease status post-triple bypass, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, obstructive sleep apnea, idiopathic thrombocytopenia, and chronic kidney disease. On examination, central vision was 20/20 in each eye. There was no RAPD. Fundoscopy demonstrated no plaques or other retinal pathology. Automated perimetry was normal. Brain MRI was unremarkable; however, brain and neck MRA showed normal cervical carotid arteries, but >80% narrowing of the right intracavernous ICA. Cerebral angiography confirmed these findings and did not show evidence of vasculitis (Fig. 2A). ESR and CRP were normal. Three months after initial presentation, patient awoke with persistent tunneling of his visual field RE. Acuity was 20/40 RE, but fundus examination demonstrated CRAO with the plaque visible in the CRA and cilioretinal sparing (Fig. 2B).FIG. 2.: A. Digital subtraction angiography of the right carotid artery demonstrating severe stenosis of its intracavernous portion (blue arrow). B. Fundus photo demonstrating general retinal whitening with the sparing of cilioretinal artery with the thrombus visible in the central retinal artery at the optic nerve head.These 2 cases demonstrate the importance of evaluating the entire carotid tree, including the intracranial circulation, in patients with evidence of thromboembolic disease (amaurosis fugax, CRAO, OIS). Doppler ultrasonography of the neck is the main recommended diagnostic modality when evaluating patients with signs of OIS; however, the stenosis or complete blockage of carotid circulation could occur anywhere from the bifurcation of ICA to the ophthalmic artery (1,2). Although atherosclerosis of the carotid arteries in the neck is the most common cause of thromboembolic disease affecting the brain (and the eye), ICAS deserves consideration in the absence of significant stenosis of the neck vessels in all patients with OIS and/or thromboembolic complications in the ocular circulation (2). Doppler ultrasound of the neck is the most common modality used when thromboembolic and/or ischemic complications in the ocular circulations are encountered with other less commonly used modalities including CTA and MRA and occasionally digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the brain and neck (1). Several studies compared the accuracy of these modalities in detecting atherosclerotic disease in the neck. When compared with histological specimens, CTA was found to have the strongest correlation with atherosclerotic disease, but underestimated the stenosis by 2.4%, whereas MRA overestimated it by 2.6% (3). Bash et al (4) compared sensitivity of DSA to CTA and MRA in detecting ICAS and found that CTA had a higher sensitivity than MRA for intracranial stenosis, a higher positive predictive value and higher interoperator reliability. The treatment for extracranial carotid artery stenosis is based on the findings of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy (NASCET) trial recommending carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis of 70%–90% and in asymptomatic stenosis Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial and VISSIT (Vitesse Intracranial Stent Study for Ischemic Stroke Therapy) trials compared aggressive medical management (antiplatelet therapy, management of vascular risk factors and lifestyle modification) against aggressive medical management and Wingspan/Vitesse stents in patients with high-grade stenosis of intracranial circulation. Both trials were prematurely terminated and demonstrated increase risk of stroke or death in patients treated with stenting compared with the medically treated group (5).The most recent recommendation from a meta-analysis of all recent trials concluded that stenting should be considered only in symptomatic ICAS patients that are hemodynamically unstable or have repeatedly failed best medical management (6). Although it is well known that CRAO and OIS are associated with extracranial carotid artery stenosis, their association with ICAS is not well appreciated. These 2 cases underline the importance of investigating the entirety of the internal carotid blood supply, because the stenosis or occlusion may occur in the intracranial portions of carotid circulation rather than the extracranial ICA. Although Doppler ultrasound has high sensitivity for picking up extracranial stenosis, if it is normal in patients demonstrating evidence of ocular thromboembolic disease or ocular hypoperfusion such as CRAO or OIS, CTA or MRA of the brain and neck should be obtained to evaluate the patency of the intracranial circulation as the source of thromboembolic disease and ocular hyperperfusion. Although treatment of intracranial carotid stenosis is mostly medical, selected patients may benefit from stenting of the sites of intracranial stenosis. STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP Category 1: a. Conception and design: E. Margolin and M. Lee; b. Acquisition of data: E. Margolin and M. Lee; c. Analysis and interpretation of data: E. Margolin and M. Lee. Category 2: a. Drafting the manuscript: L. Tong, E. Margolin, and M. Lee; b. Revising it for intellectual content: E. Margolin, M. Lee, and L. Tong. Category 3: a. Final approval of the completed manuscript: E. Margolin, M. Lee, and L. Tong.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,519
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologyMême sujetCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesTravaux en français237 207