MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3014957596 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.02.035

Commentary: Stay midline, stay steady: Median sternotomy training

2020· editorial· en· W3014957596 sur OpenAlex
Neel R. Sodha

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Techniques · 2020
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedian sternotomyMedicineCardiothoracic surgeryCardiac surgerySurgeryClosure (psychology)General surgeryMedical physics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessageFormal training and assessment on the performance of median sternotomy is often overlooked in cardiothoracic surgical education. A novel model has been developed that has been validated to provide a realistic feel for performing a sternotomy and a serve as a reproducible assessment tool.See Article page 109. Formal training and assessment on the performance of median sternotomy is often overlooked in cardiothoracic surgical education. A novel model has been developed that has been validated to provide a realistic feel for performing a sternotomy and a serve as a reproducible assessment tool. See Article page 109. I vividly remember performing my first median sternotomy as a general surgery intern. The room was busy, the music was loud. The attending surgeon peered over the drape, nodded his head toward me, and signaled to the fellow to give me the saw. My only instruction: Stay midline, stay steady. Although it is the most commonly used approach in cardiac surgery, performing a so-called good sternotomy is often an afterthought. Trainees generally acquire the skill in the operating room on actual patients. Considered a basic skill, a poorly performed median sternotomy can result in significant complications.1Zeitani J. Penta de Peppo A. Moscarelli M. Guerrieri Wolf L. Scafuri A. Nardi P. et al.Influence of sternal size and 362 inadvertent paramedian sternotomy on stability of the closure site: a clinical and 363 mechanical study.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 132: 38-42Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar Recognizing an opportunity for an adjunct educational tool, and spurred by significant support from educators and program directors in Canada, Vo and colleagues2Vo T.X. Juanda N. Ngu J. Gawad N. LaBelle K. Rubens F.D. Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 2: 109-116Google Scholar have developed a simulation model for the practice of median sternotomy and provide preliminary validation evidence for its use in training. Trehan and colleagues3Trehan K. Kemp C.D. Yang S.C. Simulation in cardiothoracic surgical training: where do we stand?.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 147: 18-24Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar have recently reviewed cardiothoracic surgical simulation. Although there are excellent models for techniques such as vascular anastomosis or cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass, the median sternotomy is often neglected. A major strength of the study by Vo and colleagues2Vo T.X. Juanda N. Ngu J. Gawad N. LaBelle K. Rubens F.D. Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 2: 109-116Google Scholar is that they have developed an inexpensive, realistic model focusing on performing this important task. The model is easy to reproduce, and blinded assessments by participants indicate they found the model to be realistic and useful. The checklist developed for the model served not only to elucidate the basic steps in performing a sternotomy, but also highlighted the importance of areas such as communication. In addition to serving as a training tool, the checklist developed by the authors also serves as a tool for assessment, allowing for incorporation of the model into a competency-based educational curriculum. While providing a new tool for training and competency assessment, the study does have a few limitations which the authors acknowledge. The sample size of 13 participants is small and nearly one-third had performed 10 or more sternotomies before participating in the study. Due to logistical constraints, the sample size could not be increased for the current article. Additionally, participants were junior trainees in the Canadian training system where cardiac surgical training begins at the completion of medical school, rather than after general surgery training, as is common in the United States. Whether more advanced trainees would find as much utility in the model is unclear. Lastly, the interrater reliability for assessment on the checklist was suboptimal, raising some questions as to the validity of the checklist as a good metric for assessment. Patients recognize the importance of a median sternotomy, often having more questions about having their chest cracked open than how the bypass is done or how the valve is sewn in place. As educators, we should ensure we pay as much attention to opening the chest as patients do. Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery trainingJTCVS TechniquesVol. 2PreviewWe sought to develop a simulation model to train resident physicians in the performance of a median sternotomy. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,085
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,299
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle