Introduction to the Invited Review Series initiative of the Journal of Fish Diseases: Health Management of Zebrafish in Research Facilities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The editorial and management team of the Journal of Fish Diseases is pleased to introduce readers to a new initiative commencing with the publication of a peer-reviewed Invited Manuscript: “Review of diseases and health management in zebrafish Danio rerio (Hamilton 1822) in research facilities” by Kent et al., found within this issue of the JFD. The goal of the Invited Review Series is to engage with researchers who have made substantial contributions to the basic and translational advances pertaining to key fish health issues, with the idea of developing a publication which not only captures the depth and significance of existing science and any potential controversy on the reviewed topics but also explores how these findings will shape the direction of future studies. At the same time, we want to provide readers with expert reviews on a range of significant and emerging issues in the area of fish health. Reviews within this series, although invited, are peer reviewed in a manner identical to all other manuscripts submitted to the JFD. Aquaculture and fish health is a global activity and global concern, and we anticipate this will be reflected in the selection of articles comprising this series. Moreover, aquaculture and fish health is a highly diverse general topic and we anticipate therefore that the review articles will reflect this in their originality of structure and content. The fish health community that supports the JFD includes researchers in many disciplines, working on many different species, and derives from interests in all parts of the world. An opportunity to highlight significant programme accomplishments from inception to translation has motivated the editorial team to work with authors in developing this Invited Review Series, and we sincerely hope that it will be a useful contribution to scientists working in connected fields and also—more broadly—to interested readers hoping to become better informed about important topics in aquatic species disease and medicine. JFD authorship and readership are at the forefront of fish health sciences, and feedback on this Invited Review Series initiative is welcomed. The topic of the first review in this series, specifically aimed at examining disease conditions arising within a key fish species used in biomedical studies, seems especially relevant given the increasing use of zebrafish as model species in studies whose outcomes are providing foundations within basic sciences and translations to human and animal health. Cautionary notes regarding the effects of disease conditions within zebrafish colonies, potentially serving as confounding variables in studies, highlight the importance of fish health professionals, fish health management strategies and the need for ongoing research in this area.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,053 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,027 | 0,014 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».