PARTICIPATION OF PHYSICIANS IN PREVENTION ACTIVITIES -A PART OF THEIR OWN PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR HEALTH
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Everyday physicians meet with patients and their families, with suffering and death, with the inability to help to each patient, with the lack of resources in healthcare, etc. They are responsible not only to their patients and to the healthcare system, but also to themselves. One of the most overlooked topics concerning their working position is caring for their own health. They are at the forefront of disease prevention and health promotion and should serve as an example, but often fall into unhealthy work patterns.The purpose of this publication is to investigate what was the participation of physicians in preventive activities (GP examinations, screening, prophylactic examinations) related to their own health status.Material and methods: A direct and anonymous questionnaire was conducted with physicians working in hospitals. The survey was based on a statistical sample, representative of the units and signs of the observation. It included doctors (n = 257), who worked in seven hospitals. The indications that determined the participation of the respondents in preventive measures related to their own health status were: not only the number of respondents with an officially selected GP, but also the number, reasons and period of their visits to him/her.Results and discussion: 98.8% of the studied physicians had a GP. Most often, they visited him/her once per an year (n = 88; 34.2%). 37.7% attended him/her two, three or more times per an year. Just over a quarter (28.00%) of the respondents said they had never met their GP. The most common reason (35.9%) for visiting GPs from hospital staff was the need for referrals, with approximately one in ten needing treatment (11.5%). In our study, 34.7% of the doctors surveyed visited GPs because of the need for prevention. Approximately half of the respondents went to a preventive examination in the last year and one third (30.7%) in the last 6 months. 11.7% of the respondents did not do preventive tests at all, and just over 2/3 of the respondents had done them in the last year.Conclusion: Hospital staff are becoming more and more important to our society because they are a significant part of the indispensable human resource responsible for providing medical services and care. Research has shown that health professionals often neglect their physical, emotional and social status, committed to helping others. One of the steps to taking personal responsibility for their health is to have a GP, to seek and participate in regular and independent preventive checkups through primary care. This will help them maintain and strengthen their own health, similar to what they desire for their patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle