The Long‐Term Effects of Exercise Mitigate Deleterious Healthspan Changes and Cancer Incidence in Mice Following Diet‐Induced Obesity and Radiation Exposure
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
There are nearly 16 million cancer survivors living in the United States today, with two‐thirds of them having received radiation therapy as part of their treatment. Furthermore, there is a concurrent increase in obesity and physical inactivity among this population. Combined with the effects of ionizing radiation (IR), these host factors are increasing the risk of secondary, treatment‐induced cancers and may contribute to poor healthspan outcomes in cancer survivors. As such, a critical need exists to develop a better understanding of how these host factors interact with radiation exposure, such that we can provide cancer survivors with better lifestyle recommendations to enhance their overall quality of life and decrease their secondary cancer risk. Male CBA mice were randomly divided into a control diet group (CTRL) or a 45% high fat diet group (HFD) to induce obesity. At nine weeks of age, half of the mice in each dietary group began a treadmill exercise training intervention (EX), or remained sedentary (SED), and were then all exposed to ionizing radiation (3 Gy) at 13 weeks of age. Healthspan was measured in each group at 17 months of age by assessing: endurance performance, metabolic and locomotor activity, depression‐like behaviour, forelimb grip strength and plasma clinical chemistry. Endurance performance was significantly greater in CTRL/EX compared to both HFD groups 5 days pre‐IR and compared to both SED groups 5 months post‐IR (both p<0.05). Metabolic analysis revealed a significant increase in the respiratory exchange ratio in CTRL compared to HFD mice (p<0.05), but there were no significant differences in O 2 consumption, CO 2 , or heat production (p>0.05). There was also a trend for an increase in locomotor activity in the CTRL/EX compared to CTRL/SED group during their light and dark cycle (p = 0.06 and p = 0.108, respectively). Further, there was a significant decrease in depression‐like behaviour among HFD compared to CTRL mice, and EX compared to SED mice (p<0.05), as well as a significant decrease in forelimb grip strength normalized to body weight among HFD compared to CTRL mice (p<0.05). Additionally, there was a significant increase in total cholesterol levels among HFD compared to CTRL mice (p<0.05). Interestingly, the CTRL/EX and HFD/EX groups had a 20% decrease in cancer incidence compared to the HFD/SED group, and EX mice had a 17.5% decrease in cancer incidence compared to SED mice, independent of diet (both p>0.05). Our current findings suggest that long‐term exercise and dietary interventions should be implemented in cancer survivors exposed to radiation therapy in order to improve healthspan and potentially protect against secondary cancer incidence. Support or Funding Information The American Institute of Cancer Research (AICR), The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».