Sustainability Education: Inclusive Lens for Global Economy-an ESRAP Panel
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
According to Henninger, Alevizou, and Oates (2016) fashion is subjective in nature. Thus, it is important to understand the definition and meaning of sustainability in the global marketplace. Additionally, consumers today have a growing awareness of practices that lead to sustainable living (Welters, 2015). Indeed, with an increased awareness of global concerns in the fashion industry through initiatives such as the UN’s Global Goals, Fashion Revolution, and the Copenhagen Fashion Summit there is a need to incorporate sustainability into apparel education programs.\nThe purpose of the proposed panel is to educate and increase awareness of the various global initiatives relative to sustainability in the apparel industry. In the U.S. we tend to teach in a microcosm, focusing on local or region-specific versus global needs. Thus, the objective of this panel is enhance the classroom experience through a cultural comparison of sustainable apparel practices throughout the globe.\nESRAP Panel: Rachel Eike, Erin Irick, Tara Konya, Young. A. Lee, Virginia Noon, Anupama Pasricha\nGuest Panelist:\nPanel Leader and Moderator: Tara Konya\nStructure: Panel discussion followed by audience engagement through open discussion or invitation\n1. Regions: In order to continue with this panel we will need to define regions. However, each macro-region could be broken down into micro subsections. For example, The US and Canada have a vastly different approach to sustainable. Similarly, the same can be said about Europe and Scandinavian Countries. North America Africa Asia Central America & the Caribbean Europe Oceania South America \n2. Key topics to discuss: According to the Copenhagen Fashion Summit and the Global Fashion Agenda (GFA) there are three core priorities for immediate implementation in the apparel industry: supply chain traceability efficient use of water, energy, and chemical respectful and secure work environments \nAdditionally, there are four transformational priorities for fundamental change: sustainable material mix closed-loops fashion system promotion of better wage systems the fourth industrial revolution. \nFor the purpose of this panel, we should focus on the four transformational change priorities, as the classroom is the first place to begin this change. Additionally, it is important to discuss the perceptions of each topic as well as region-specific issues related to each.\nNote: Each panelist identify a key topic area from the highlight transformational priorities list Identify a region that they will use to illustrate the topic area identified (example from that region based on their expertise and knowledge of the region) If you have other suggestions, feel free to add as comments. \nClaudia E. Henninger, Panayiota J. Alevizou, Caroline J. Oates, (2016) "What is sustainable fashion?", Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 20 Issue: 4, pp.400-416, https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2015-0052\nWelters, L. (2015). The Fashion of Sustainability. In J. Hethorn & C. Ulasewicz (Eds.). Sustainable Fashion What’s Next?: A Conversation about Issues, Practices and Possibilities (pp. 4–26). London: Fairchild Books. Retrieved September 21 2018, from http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781501312250.ch-001\nO’Connor, T. (March 27, 2018) https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/news-analysis/fashions-7-priorities-to-achieve-sustainability
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle