Turning around a medical education conference: Ottawa 2020 in the time of COVID‐19
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Ottawa 2020 Conference on the Assessment of Health Professionals and Evaluation of Programmes was held from 29 February to 4 March 2020 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, co-organised by the Association for Medical Education in Europe and the International Medical University (http://ottawa2020.org/). Between late January and early February 2020, reports of the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases led to concerns about its impact on Ottawa 2020. By mid-February, 10% of participants, many of whom were presenters, had withdrawn from the conference due to either personal reasons, work or travel restrictions. The potential impact of further participant withdrawals on the programme and on scholarly engagement was of major concern to the organisers, as was the ability to provide a safe and welcoming environment for participants. Following a risk assessment, a decision was taken not to postpone or cancel Ottawa 2020. All possible steps were taken to safeguard the well-being of attendees, based on the World Health Organization guidelines February 20201 and advisory from the Ministry of Health Malaysia. A needs assessment informed the transformation to a ‘blended conference,’ with a mix of face to face and online content to support those attending on site and those participating at a distance. Limited resources, in particular the 15-day timeline to transform the event, were major considerations. Additional roles and responsibilities were identified, and a streaming service provider was engaged to live stream all plenaries and symposia to registered participants. Key speakers who were unable to attend were able to either present live or to send a recorded presentation and join a live question and answer session with both on site and online participants, the latter monitored by an on-site moderator. Participants with oral presentations were able to send videos, and poster presenters could submit Portable Document Formats (PDFs) with quick response (QR) codes for subsequent contact. Technologies appropriate for the context were selected, detailed instructions for moderators, speakers and participants were communicated, and a plan for a post-conference repository was formulated. Almost 700 participants attended the conference in person. For each of the streamed sessions, online participation ranged from 50 to 95. Although both on site and online participants generally evaluated the conference well, a number of online participants requested for more online moderators to improve engagement. The streaming and repository were appreciated by many.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,028 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,018 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,013 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,072 | 0,017 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».