Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Different Sensitivities of Genes to EP <sub>4</sub> Receptor Agonist Stimulation in BEAS‐2B Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Prostanoid EP 4 ‐receptors are highly expressed on human airway epithelial cells (AECs) and typically mediate canonical, Gs‐cAMP signaling. EP 4 ‐receptor agonists exhibit bronchodilator and anti‐inflammatory activity and could represent novel therapeutic candidates to treat obstructive lung diseases. We have reported previously that long‐acting β 2 ‐adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) promote significant gene expression changes in human AECs, which could contribute to their clinical efficacy. In this study, we have determined the EP 4 ‐receptor‐regulated transcriptome in BEAS‐2B cells using the selective agonist, ONO‐AE1‐329, using the LABA, vilanterol, as a comparator. Methods BEAS‐2B cells were treated for 2h with vehicle, and two concentrations of ONO‐AE1‐329 (1nM, ONO 1 ; 1000nM, ONO 1000 ). A maximally effective concentration of vilanterol (100nM, Vil 100 ) was included to define maximum responses. Gene expression changes were determined by RNA sequencing. Simulated E /[A] curves were generated from ONO 1 and ONO 1000 data assuming a unity Hill coefficient for each gene expression change (≥3‐fold; FDR ≤5%). BEAS‐2B cells transfected with a cAMP response element (CRE) luciferase reporter were used to determine the affinity ( K A ) of ONO‐AE1‐329 for the EP 4 ‐receptor. This was estimated by operational model fitting of E /[A] curve data before and after fractional receptor depletion using siRNA mediated PTGER4 gene silencing. Occupancy‐response relationships for ONO‐AE1‐329‐induced genes were constructed using the simulated E /[A] curves and the K A value determined in CRE reporter cells. Results Transcriptomic changes produced by Vil 100 and ONO 1000 were highly correlated suggesting that the β 2 ‐adrenoceptor and the EP 4 ‐receptor shared a common mechanism of action. Vilanterol was a full agonist on all induced genes whereas ONO‐AE1‐329 was a partial agonist with intrinsic activity values that varied between genes. The K A of ONO‐AE1‐329 was found to be consistent with a previous radioligand binding study. ONO‐AE1‐329‐induced genes differed in sensitivity by ~18‐fold with NR4A3 and PDE4B representing transcripts at the extremes of this sensitivity spectrum. Accordingly, receptor occupancy‐response relationships varied from almost linear (where response is directly proportional to occupancy; e.g., NR4A3 ) to markedly hyperbolic (indicative of a significant receptor reserve; e.g., PDE4B ) (Fig. ). Conclusions Differences in the sensitivities of genes to ONO‐AE1‐329 indicate that the EP 4 ‐receptor interprets equivalent degrees of receptor occupancy differently. This may be explained by ‐ a) regulation by multiple cAMP‐induced transcription factors, and/or b) variability in promoter context and co‐factor binding which may differentially affect the ability of transcription factors to interact favorably with DNA. Support or Funding Information CIHR‐ PJT 152904 Receptor occupancyresponse relationships for ONO‐AE1‐329 induced genes Figure 1
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».