The development of university-based actuarial education in Canada
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The paper is aimed at figuring out the current state of actuarial education \nprovided by Canadian universities tracing the peculiarities of its development and \nconcentrating mainly on the process of the University accreditation program \nimplementation. The academic novelty of the article lies in the fact that in national \ncomparative pedagogy it is the first attempt to analyze Canada`s university-based \nactuarial education. Having studied the documents, we may conclude that the UAP \nis a set of the criteria and requirements having fulfilled which a university is granted \nthe right to provide its actuarial students with the opportunity of exemption from \nthe professional exams set by the SOA and the CAS on their way to the ACIA or \nFCIA designations. It is worth mentioning that in many ways Canada is the first \ncountry in North America which is now actively trying to bring the profession of an \nactuary into academic environment. The reasons for implementing such measures are \nobvious: university settings open wide prospects for research activities as well as \nprovide more predictable route for becoming a qualified actuary as compared to its \nalternative of going through the set of the exams established by the above mentioned \nbodies. By integration of formal and informal actuarial education into a single \nwhole it is possible to strengthen the profession. However, the main obstacle on the \nway to success of the UAP is the assumption that by shifting educational process to \nuniversities we are reducing professional standards. Under such circumstances the \nUAP policy is characterized by stringent selection criteria as for the syllabi, course \noutlines, faculty members, minimum exemption grades etc.. The main of them can be \nbroadly summarized as follows. In order to be accredited a university has to provide \n85 % coverage of the syllabus of the professional bodies, to have at least 4 full-time \nfaculties, one of them has to be a fellow of the CIA, rigid testing and examination \nprocedures are a must; for students to get the exemption, the grade on each of the \ncourses in question has to be not lower than «B» or higher. In order to figure out \nwhether a university satisfies the standards, lots of administrative bodies have been \ncreated or engaged: the Eligibility and Education Council, the CIA, the Accreditation \ncommittee, accreditation panels, appeal investigation panels etc. For the time being, \nthere are 11 universities which comply with the given requirements. Overall, the \nUAP can be considered as a successfully implemented experiment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle