Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Galileo, long-time hero to historians of science, also casts a giant shadow on the history of Italian prose: his published output spanned many genres, from operation manual to over-sophisticated dialogue.The draft of a play, sonnets and other poetry, and reading notes survived him unpublished.What, asks Hall, did he read, and what was the relationship between his literary reading and his scientific writing?Hall is closer to answering these questions than any preceding literary critic, though the material may well be more problematic than she admits in this book.(She has since addressed this point in her article "Galileo's Library Reconsidered" in Galilaeana, XII, 2015, 29-82).She's quite right to resist the clichés of Galileo's early hagiographies, such as that of his creepy acolyte Vincenzo Viviani, who pitted Galileo's study of nature against that of books: "He equipped himself with very few books, " Viviani wrote in his 1654 Racconto istorico della vita di Galileo, "but these were the best and the nicest; he praised good writings on philosophy and geometry to enlighten and arouse the mind to similar or higher speculations, but rightly said that the principal portals via which one should enter the rich treasury of natural philosophy were observations and experiments" (translation mine).Over a century ago, the great Galileo editor Antonio Favaro published his interpretative reconstruction of Galileo's library, consisting of more than five hundred titles.Favaro depended on several sources: centrally, two imprecise book inventories from Galileo's heirs, drawn up decades after his death, supplemented by Galileo's surviving books (sometimes embellished with his marginalia), plus titles mentioned in his correspondence and printed works.Hall has now revisited these documents and uses them as the door to enter Galileo's study.Before following Favaro, though, it's worth considering the problems posed by these sources: a 1641 inventory of Galileo's own possessions mentions only "forty pieces of books." Perhaps he gave away his library when he went blind; or perhaps Galileo's relatives merged their inheritance with their own collections.Indeed, Favaro's lists are perhaps actually a diversion from the harder question of Galileo's reading; he had, after all, access to one of the best
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,013 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».