MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3021645988 · doi:10.1177/1464420720917415

Machine learning models applied to friction stir welding defect index using multiple joint configurations and alloys

2020· article· en· W3021645988 sur OpenAlex
François Nadeau, Benoit Thériault, Marc-Olivier Gagné

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part L Journal of Materials Design and Applications · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAdvanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Établissements canadiensNational Research Council Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWeldingFriction stir weldingRotational speedMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceWeldabilityMultilayer perceptronFriction weldingComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Friction stir welding process has been studied extensively in the last decades since its early stage. Most of the research done so far is related to the process development including tool design, material weldability, post-weld mechanical behavior, and microstructural properties. More recently, in-line process monitoring and artificial intelligence algorithms are introduced into this process, but mainly to specific material configuration and joint thicknesses. This study will focus on the evaluation of different machine learning approaches including principle component analysis, K-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, single vector machine, and random forest methods on a friction stir welding cell environment. The input variables provided from this cell environment are namely divided into two groups: one group refers to the application variables and the other group is related to the friction stir welding process variables. The application variables target the aluminum alloys, joint configuration, sheet thicknesses, initial mechanical properties, and their chemical composition. The friction stir welding process variables dictate the rotational speed, travel speed, forging force, longitudinal and transverse forces, torque, and specific energy. The output response to model from these machine learning algorithms is the defect index, which has been quantified using high-resolution immersed bath ultrasounds. This nondestructive evaluation technique has been described previously, which can detect defects ≥150 µm in thin sheets. The defect index has been classified into five classes, which is distinguished by the nature of defect, cold weld, or hot weld, as well as the width of the internal volumetric defect upon ultrasound C-scan result. The dataset, which is composed of around 500 various process conditions, has been generated over the last few years and the variables were taken exclusively in constant weld regime and in the force control mode using the output average values. This paper compares the best resulting machine learning methods applied on a friction stir welding cell basis, which is the K-nearest neighbor and multilayer perceptron algorithms. The K-nearest neighbor model reaches a deviation of 0.55 on the defect index in comparison with the experimental values, which is slightly better than the multilayer perceptron model, which obtains a score of 0.69. Over the initial 59 available model parameters, 10 and 15 of them were retained in the final algorithm using these techniques. The main predictors include the material thickness, base material ultimate tensile stress, rotational speed, travel speed, weld forces, and specific energy. The K-nearest neighbor model was able to provide a map of defect indices with regard to rotational speed and travel speed but was only possible when a higher density of data was found within the prediction area. A data density score was also included within the model to inform the end-user about the prediction reliability. The machine learning models are mainly about differentiating various cases rather than representing the physical phenomena as determined using the finite element analysis. That being said, in order to improve the prediction reliability as well as the machine learning models, the data twinning concept, which consists of generating simulated friction stir welding process conditions by finite element analysis, is briefly discussed.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,836
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,447

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle