Canada and the First World War: Essays in Honour of Robert Craig Brown/Fight or Pay: Soldiers' Families in the Great War
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
David MacKenzie (ed.), Canada and the First World War: Essays in Honour of Robert Craig Brown (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005), 452pp. Cloth. $85/£65. ISBN 0-8020-3573-6. Paper. $35/£20. ISBN 0-8020-8445-1. Desmond Morton, Fight or Pay: Soldiers' Families in the Great War (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2004), 368pp. Cloth. $39.95. ISBN 0-7748- 1108-0. It is unfortunate that the official cataloguing of David MacKenzie's collection gives us 1939-1945 as the dates of the First World War, since it is an exceptionally scholarly and generally well presented text. Produced as a tribute to an American who became one of Canada's best-known authorities on the Great War, it contains 15 essays by leading Canadian historians, representing a cross-section of Brown's friends, colleagues and former students. As usual in such Festschriften, the contributions vary in length (from 12 to 42 pages), scope and content but all are of considerable interest. While it is generally acknowledged that the First World War forged a distinctive national identity for Canada, the concomitant tensions and divisions in Canadian society have been less widely recognised. This academic lacuna is addressed by the contributors to this book, who examine many of the fractures and frictions caused by the war. The book is divided into four parts: 'Introduction', 'Fighting the War', 'The War at Home' and 'The Aftermath'. This seemingly logical organisation is actually the book's only major weakness. The introduction includes the editor's broad-brush outline of the book's contents and an engaging portrait of Craig Brown and his career in Canadian academia. Thereafter, the distinctions between the book's major sections - Parts Two and Three - are not always clear-cut; for example, the essays on political leadership and economic impact are placed in 'Fighting the War' but could equally well fit into 'The War at Home'. Moreover, the latter contains such disparate topics that the term 'dog's breakfast' springs to mind. It would surely have been more logical to group together the six essays with a distinctly social, political or economic focus, leaving a residual category dealing with regional and provincial issues. In Part Two, Copp's 'The Military Effort, 1914-1918', provides both a factual foundation and a contextual framework for much of the rest of the book. We are reminded that, constitutionally speaking, Canada went to war in 1914 because Britain did. The same is true of the then separate colony of Newfoundland, which is included within the scope of this book. Copp highlights some of the varying regional attitudes to the war, which are subsequently elaborated in the studies of Ontario, western Canada and the Maritimes. The widespread antipathy of French Canadians to 'la grande guerre' (ascribed to their 'isolationism') is somewhat surprising given the selfless defence of French soil by other Canadians at places such as Beaumont Hamel and Vimy Ridge. Conscription, necessary by the spring of 1917, not only accentuated such regional contrasts but became nationally divisive. Essays on Borden's leadership and the war's economic impact complete Part Two. In addition to the regional topics already alluded to, Part Three includes contributions on the mobilisation of women for war work, the development of science and technology, and the impact of American culture on Canada. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,021 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».