MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3022873668 · doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000000847.010

PD13-10 THE PREVALENCE OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE AND ITS RISK FACTORS AMONG PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH AND WITHOUT ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION

2020· article· en· W3022873668 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jehonathan H. Pinthus, Bobby Shayegan, Robert Siemens, Laurence Klotz, Patrick Luke, Tamim Niazi, Vincent Fradet, Yves Fradet, Emmanuelle Duceppe, Luke T. Lavallée, Negareh Mousavi, Robert J. Hamilton, Ian H. Brown, Joseph L. Chin, Darin Gopaul, Philippe D. Violette, Margot K. Davis, Sarah Karampatos, Rajibul Mian, Darryl P. Leong

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Urology · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProstate cancerChinMedicineDiseaseCancerClassicsGerontologyHistoryPathologyInternal medicineAnatomy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Epidemiology & Natural History I (PD13)1 Apr 2020PD13-10 THE PREVALENCE OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE AND ITS RISK FACTORS AMONG PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH AND WITHOUT ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION Jehonathan Pinthus*, Bobby Shayegan, Robert Siemens, Laurence Klotz, Patrick Luke, Tamim Niazi, Vincent Fradet, Yves Fradet, Emmanuelle Duceppe, Luke Lavallee, Negareh Mousavi, Robert Hamilton, Ian Brown, Joseph Chin, Darin Gopaul, Darin Gopaul, Philippe Violette, Margot Davis, Sarah Karampatos, Rajibul Mian, and Darryl Leong Jehonathan Pinthus*Jehonathan Pinthus* More articles by this author , Bobby ShayeganBobby Shayegan More articles by this author , Robert SiemensRobert Siemens More articles by this author , Laurence KlotzLaurence Klotz More articles by this author , Patrick LukePatrick Luke More articles by this author , Tamim NiaziTamim Niazi More articles by this author , Vincent FradetVincent Fradet More articles by this author , Yves FradetYves Fradet More articles by this author , Emmanuelle DuceppeEmmanuelle Duceppe More articles by this author , Luke LavalleeLuke Lavallee More articles by this author , Negareh MousaviNegareh Mousavi More articles by this author , Robert HamiltonRobert Hamilton More articles by this author , Ian BrownIan Brown More articles by this author , Joseph ChinJoseph Chin More articles by this author , Darin GopaulDarin Gopaul More articles by this author , Darin GopaulDarin Gopaul More articles by this author , Philippe ViolettePhilippe Violette More articles by this author , Margot DavisMargot Davis More articles by this author , Sarah KarampatosSarah Karampatos More articles by this author , Rajibul MianRajibul Mian More articles by this author , and Darryl LeongDarryl Leong More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000847.010AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the second most common cause of death in prostate cancer (PC) patients, yet the prevalence of CVD and its risk factors have been incompletely described in this population. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a risk factor for CVD. The objectives of this study were to describe the CVD characteristics and risk factors in PC patients and the relationship between CVD risk and how ADT is used in real-world practice. METHODS: RADICAL-PC (Role of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in CArdiovascular Disease – A Longitudinal Prostate Cancer Study) is an ongoing prospective cohort study. We recruited 2395 consecutive men (mean age 68 years) with newly diagnosed PC or with a plan to prescribe ADT for the first time. Cardiovascular risk was estimated by calculating Framingham risk scores. A Framingham score >17 (corresponding with a predicted 10-year CVD risk of >30%) was considered high-risk. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with ADT use as the outcome variable and CVD risk factors as the exposures of interest. RESULTS: The prevalence of known CVD for the entire cohort was 22% and 35% had a Framingham risk score >17. Most participants (58%) were current or former smokers; 16% had diabetes; 45% had hypertension and 23% had high blood pressure but had not received a diagnosis of hypertension; 31% were obese (BMI ≥30kg/m2); 24% had low levels of physical activity. There was a positive relationship between each major cardiovascular risk factor and the use of ADT. However, after adjustment for age, education, alcohol use, BMI and time from PC diagnosis to eligibility assessment, these associations were significantly attenuated. Participants in whom ADT was planned had higher Framingham risk scores than those not intending to receive ADT. This risk was abolished after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: One in three men with PC is at high cardiovascular risk. Men receiving ADT are a priori at higher CVD risk than PC patients whose treatment strategy does not include ADT. These differences are explained by confounding factors. Source of Funding: Prostate Cancer CanadaHamilton Health Sciences Strategic Research Initiative Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e270-e270 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jehonathan Pinthus* More articles by this author Bobby Shayegan More articles by this author Robert Siemens More articles by this author Laurence Klotz More articles by this author Patrick Luke More articles by this author Tamim Niazi More articles by this author Vincent Fradet More articles by this author Yves Fradet More articles by this author Emmanuelle Duceppe More articles by this author Luke Lavallee More articles by this author Negareh Mousavi More articles by this author Robert Hamilton More articles by this author Ian Brown More articles by this author Joseph Chin More articles by this author Darin Gopaul More articles by this author Darin Gopaul More articles by this author Philippe Violette More articles by this author Margot Davis More articles by this author Sarah Karampatos More articles by this author Rajibul Mian More articles by this author Darryl Leong More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,032

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,261
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of UrologyMême sujetProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchTravaux en français237 207