MON-117 Reducing Unnecessary Repeat Vitamin D Testing at a Large Ambulatory Hospital: A Quality Improvement Initiative
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: With the increasing interest in the importance and potential benefits of vitamin D, there has been a significant rise in unnecessary vitamin D testing. The aim of the project was to reduce unnecessary repeat vitamin D testing at Women’s College Hospital by 50% by May 30th 2020. Methods: The Model for Improvement framework was used in the design of the quality improvement project to reduce unnecessary repeat vitamin D testing. Problem characterization was conducted to design the intervention to address root causes and iterative Plan-do-Study-Act cycles were used to develop an intervention that incorporated a best practice advisory (BPA). The primary outcome measure was unnecessary vitamin D testing. Unnecessary repeat testing was defined as: repeat 25-hydroxyvitamin D testing within 3 months or repeat 25-hydroxyvitamin D testing after a normal result (>75 mmol/L) in the preceding 12 months. Secondary outcomes which included BPAs generated, as well as the number of BPAs that resulted in no test being ordered were tracked. Paper-based orders were also tracked as a balancing measure. Results: It was identified that 12.7% of vitamin D testing (n= 289/2276) between July 2017 and July 2018 was related to unnecessary repeat testing. Following our cause and effect analysis and problem characterization, it was noted that providers ordered repeat vitamin D testing due to being unaware of prior normal results, as well as due to a knowledge gap of current testing recommendations. If the 25-hydroxyvitamin D order was identified as unnecessary at the time of order entry, a BPA was generated at the point of care. The BPA was implemented on February 4th, 2019. As of August 31st, 2019 based on the analysis of the number of BPAs generated and the number of tests not ordered as a result, there has been a 26% reduction in the number of inappropriate repeat vitamin D orders. Conclusions: Based on the preliminary data, a best practice advisory alert for vitamin D testing can be an appropriate QI intervention to reduce unnecessary vitamin D testing. Ongoing data analysis will be conducted to assess the long-term impact and sustainability of this intervention. Next steps include consideration of implementation of force function to reduce inappropriate repeat vitamin D testing.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».