COMORBIDITY AND NON-PROSTHETIC INPATIENT REHABILITATION OUTCOMES AFTER DYSVASCULAR LOWER EXTREMITY AMPUTATION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Dysvascular amputations arising from peripheral vascular disease and/or diabetes are common. Patients who undergo amputation often have additional comorbidities that may impact their recovery after surgery. Many individuals undergo post-operative inpatient rehabilitation to improve their non-prosthetic functional independence. Thus far, our characterization of comorbidity in this population and how it is associated with non-prosthetic inpatient functional recovery remains relatively unexplored. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe comorbidities, using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and to examine associations between comorbidity and functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with dysvascular limb loss undergoing non-prosthetic inpatient rehabilitation. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective cohort design was used to analyze a group of 143 patients with unilateral, dysvascular limb loss who were admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. Age, sex, amputation level, amputation side, length of stay (LOS), time since surgery, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores (Total and Motor at admission and discharge), and CCI scores were collected. FINDINGS: The data showed that neither total or specific comorbidities were associated with functional outcomes or LOS in this cohort and rehabilitation model. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an inverse relationship with age and FIM scores, where increased age was associated with lower Total and Motor FIM at admission and discharge. Comorbidities were not associated with functional outcomes. Dementia was negatively associated with FIM scores, however this requires more study given the low number of patients with dementia in this cohort. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that regardless of burden of comorbidity or specific comorbidities that patients with dysvascular limb loss may derive similar functional benefit from post-operative non-prosthetic inpatient rehabilitation. Layman’s Abstract: Lower extremity limb loss arising from peripheral vascular disease and/or diabetes is common. Patients who require amputation often have multiple medical conditions that may impact their recovery after surgery. Moreover, many individuals undergo inpatient rehabilitation after surgery to improve self-care and mobility before discharge from hospital. We understand very little about how multiple medical conditions in patients with recent limb loss who are admitted to rehabilitation hospitals are impacted. Specifically, whether individuals with multiple medical conditions have negative functional consequences and do they stay in a rehabilitation hospital for a longer period of time. The objective of this study was to describe the types of medical conditions that patients with recent limb loss have and to examine the relationship between these conditions with functional outcomes and length of stay in hospital while undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. 143 patients with unilateral, dysvascular limb loss who were admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation hospital were included in the analysis. Age, gender, amputation level, amputation side, length of stay, time since surgery, Functional Independence Measure scores (measure of a patient’s function) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (measure of multiple medical conditions) scores were collected. This study suggests that regardless of the burden of multiple medical conditions or specific medical problems, that patients with recent limb loss may derive similar benefit after surgery at an inpatient rehabilitation hospital prior to consideration for a prosthesis. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/33916/26327 How To Cite: Marquez M.G., Kowgier M., Journeay W.S. Comorbidity and non-prosthetic inpatient rehabilitation outcomes after dysvascular lower extremity amputation. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2020;Volume3, Issue1, No.1. https://doi.org/ 10.33137/cpoj.v3i1.33916 Corresponding Author: Dr. W. Shane Journeay, PhD, MD, MPH, FRCPC, BC-Occ MedProvidence Healthcare – Unity Health Toronto, 3276 St Clair Avenue East, Toronto ON M1L 1W1E-mail: shane.journeay@utoronto.caORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-3176
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».