MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3025193206 · doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa288

Deer Hunters: Beware of Toxoplasmosis!

2020· letter· en· W3025193206 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katarina Westling

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2020
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésToxoplasmosisGeographyVirologyArchaeologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

(See the Major Article by Schumacher et al on pages 1557–65.) In this issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Schumacher and colleagues [1] describe an outbreak of acute toxoplasmosis in 9 men who participated in a weekend retreat with barbecue. Of 11 men (out of 12) who participated in the barbecue and ate undercooked venison meat, 9 developed clinical symptoms in the form of fever and muscular pain. All the sick men sought medical care and were treated with doxycycline. An infection with Anaplasma or Ehrlichia was initially suspected, but panel tests were negative. The time from eating the venison until clinical symptoms was a median of 7 days. The disease lasted for a median of 12 days. After discussion with an expert team at the Wisconsin Department of Health services, extensive microbiological analyses were performed and other infectious diseases, such as trichinellosis, leptospirosis, brucellosis, and influenzae, were excluded. Finally, serological tests for toxoplasmosis were performed, and Toxoplasma gondii Ig M was positive. An investigation of the outbreak was initiated, and interviews of the participants of the barbecue were performed. Multiple laboratory tests were performed at toxoplasma reference laboratories in the United States and France. Supplemental serological tests analyzed in humans confirmed the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Toxoplasma gondii oocysts were found in the venison. The toxoplasma strain from the venison was identified as closely related to an atypical genotype—haplogroup 12, polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism genotype 5—that is common in North American wild animals. Atypical strains of toxoplasmosis have been found in earlier studies in humans in the United States [2]. The seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in the United States among white-tailed deer has been reported to be 23–74%. The clinical symptoms and laboratory signs were different from those previously described in toxoplasmosis: only one-third had lymphadenopathy, one-third had ocular symptoms, and a majority had lymphopenia and elevated transaminases. There were 2 men who ate the venison but did not develop any clinical signs of infection: 1 had serological signs of an earlier toxoplasmosis infection, and the other was seronegative. Another man participating in the barbecue did not eat the meat and did not get sick. All of the men were immunocompetent (at the time for the study), and all seemed to be cured, but the authors did not present a follow-up of the clinical symptoms. There have been a few publications concerning toxoplasmosis in hunters who had eaten undercooked venison [3]. In a recently published paper from Emerging Infectious Diseases, Gaulin and colleagues [4] describe 9 Canadian deer hunters who had eaten undercooked venison: 6 of them developed fever, myalgia, and joint pain, and toxoplasma was identified by serological tests (immunoglobin M and a low-avidity test). In the study by Gaulin et al [4], 1 patient was hospitalized, and there was no report of antibiotic treatment. An epidemiological investigation was made, and other infections were excluded. In 3 hunters who ate the venison without any clinical symptoms, 2 were immune and 1 was nonimmune. The frozen deer meat was analyzed, but no toxoplasma parasites were detected. The seroprevalence of toxoplasma antibodies in humans in the United States has been reported to be 13.2% [5]. There have been a few studies performed in the seroprevalences of toxoplasmosis among hunters. In a study from Poland, in the Lublin Province, 42% of the hunters had antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii [6]. In Estonia, the toxoplasma antibody prevalence among hunters was 65.3% [7]. Acute toxoplasmosis seldom causes symptoms in immunocompetent patients. The signs are unspecific and include fever, myalgia, and lymphadenopathy. Toxoplasmosis is transmitted either by cysts from undercooked meat or from food and water contaminated with oocysts from infected cat feces. Cats are the definitive hosts of the parasite. Mother-to-child transmission of toxoplasmosis is important and can cause congenital disease. The infection is lifelong and could be reactivated after many years. It is an important opportunistic pathogen in immunocompromised patients (including patients with AIDS), for whom a reactivation of Toxoplasma gondii can cause severe symptoms, such as chorioretinitis and encephalopathy. Doxycycline, which was administered to the patients in the study, has been shown to have activity against toxoplasmosis (in vitro and in vivo) [8] but is not the drug of choice for treating toxoplasmosis. The standard treatment is pyrimethamine-sulfadiazine. The question is whether the disease was self-limited. A shortcoming of the study is the lack of long-term follow-up of the patients. A third of the men reported ocular symptoms, and we do not know whether they healed or whether the patients had any sequelae. The results from the present study—of patients with atypical clinical symptoms of toxoplasmosis and a high attack rate—highlights the importance of investigating the presence of toxoplasma among hunters (and their families and friends) with an acute infection. Interestingly, none of the health care providers initially suspected toxoplasmosis. Patients seeking medical care due to fever and an infection of unknown origin should also be asked about their hunting habits and whether they have ingested game. It is also of importance to inform hunters (and their families) to not eat undercooked meat and to wash their hands after handling raw meat. Potential conflicts of interest. The author: No reported conflicts of interest. The author has submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,228
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,347
Écart entre enseignants0,299 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical Infectious DiseasesMême sujetToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesTravaux en français237 207