Controlling the Surface Properties of Electrodeposited Ni Films
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Polymer/metal composites, including polymer films deposited on metallic layers, are very important because of the increasing demand of these advanced materials in multiple applications, such as in microelectronics, automotive, aerospace, and medical devices [1]. The surface topography of the metal substrate is a critical factor in producing a good adhesion surface, particularly for polymer films. In this work, electrodeposition was used to create a micro/nano-structured Ni surface with specific engineered properties, with Ni selected as it has excellent abrasion, erosion, and corrosion resistance and can therefore be used in many aggressive environments. While previous work [e.g., 2,3] has examined the effect of electrodeposition conditions on the resulting Ni surface morphology and crystallite size, particularly to achieve a high surface areas [4,5], our goal was to determine the optimum surface properties to enhance the adhesion of various elastomeric coatings, while also ensuring that a high strength Ni layer was produced. In the present work, a Watt’s bath was employed for Ni electrodeposition [2], with the main variables being the applied current density, temperature, stirring rate, and chemical additives, resulting in microstructures of a range of shapes and roughness [6, 7], where the surfactant was used to minimize hydrogen bubble adhesion under negative polarization [8]. A range of Ni substrates was examined, including Ni plates, rods and electroformed Ni, having a thickness of ca. 0.1 mm and a complex shape, intended for use particularly in aerospace applications. For our purposes, it was found that low current densities of ~ 5 mA/cm2 and a temperature of 40 oC produced surface morphologies having the desired characteristics. An example of SEM and 3D optical profilometry images of an electrodeposited Ni deposited on a Ni plate is shown in Fig. 1, with the applied current density clearly affecting the surface roughness and crystallite shape. At lower current densities, the electrodeposited Ni surface exhibited pyramidal-like structures, interconnected with a finer matrix and having a high roughness factor, while at higher current densities, the surface is fully covered by a very fine structure with a small grain size and a lower degree of roughness. The results also showed that the adhesion of the electrodeposited Ni films on the Ni substrate is better for samples prepared at lower current densities. This presentation will also discuss the results of pulsed electrodeposition and electrodeposition-dissolution methods to produce the desired Ni surface morphology and strength characteristics, as well as the results of elastomer adhesion testing. References [1] Yacobia BG, Martin S, Davis K, Hudson A, Hubertb M. J Appl Phys 91(2002)6227. [2] S. Shriram, S. Mohan, N.G. Renganathan, R. Venkatachalam, Transactions of the IMF, 78:5(2000)194. [3] C. Ma, S. C. Wang & F. C. Walsh, Transactions of the IMF, 93:1(2015)8. [4] I. Herraiz-Cardona, E. Ortega, L. Vázquez-Gómez, V. Pérez-Herranz, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37:3(2012)2147. [5] H. Shin, J. Dong, M. Liu, Advanced Materials 15(2003)1610. [6] Y. Deng, H. Ling, X. Feng, T. Hang, M. Li, CrystEngComm 17(2015)868. [7] T. Hang, M. Li, Q. Fei, D. Mao, Nanotechnology 19(2008)035201. [8] Chen L, Wang L, Zeng Z, Zhang J. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 434 (2006)319. Figure 1. SEM and 3D profilometry images of Ni films electrodeposited on a Ni plate at (a,b) lower (5 mA/cm2) and (c,d) higher current densities (60 mA/cm2). Figure 1
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».