Electrospun Li<sub>1.3</sub>Al<sub>0.3</sub>Ti<sub>1.7</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> Nanofibers to Develop Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium Metal Batteries
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
During the last decades lithium-ion battery (LIB) has progressively become the benchmark for developing novel energy storage systems for portable and automotive applications. Although the energy density of commercial LIBs has increased significantly over time, it is now reaching a physicochemical limit (~800 Wh L-1), which arises from current materials technology [1]. Hence, a new paradigm is needed to develop next-generation high-energy batteries. A promising candidate is the all-solid-state lithium battery, which features a solid ion-conductive material acting as both separator and electrolyte and usually referred to as solid-state electrolyte (SSE). When compared to flammable organic-based liquid electrolytes, widely used in commercial LIBs, SSEs are characterized by better electrochemical and thermal stabilities as well as by a higher mechanical strength, all of which are beneficial for the safety of the final device. They also enable the use of lithium metal as anode, which potentially increases the volumetric energy density of the cell by up to 70% [1]. SSEs are usually made of polymeric, ceramic or composite materials and, regardless of the composition, they are characterized by some key issues that undermine the performance of the final device. Specifically, the low ionic conductivity at room temperature and the poor interfacial compatibility with the electrodes are the main challenges the scientific community is addressing. Recently, the use of 1-dimensional structures as nanofiller has been reported as an effective strategy to improve ionic conductivity and mechanical properties of composite polymer electrolytes (CPEs) [2–4]. Inorganic nanowires and nanofibers resulted to be also advantageous for increasing the density and therefore the ionic conductivity of ceramic electrolytes [5,6]. Herein, we propose the use of ceramic NASICON-like Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 (LATP) nanofibers to develop SSEs for lithium batteries. LATP is one of the most promising ceramic material for designing an SSE because it has the highest ionic conductivity in the Li-NASICON family (7 · 10-4 S cm-1 at 25 °C), it is chemically and thermally stable in atmosphere conditions, and it can be synthesized by using low cost and easily-processable precursors [7]. The synthesis of LATP nanofibers was performed by incorporating an electrospinning step into a conventional sol-gel process [8]. Specifically, a solution containing the precursor materials and a polymer carrier was electrospun to produce a nanofibrous precursor membrane. The achieved membrane was then calcined to synthesize ceramic LATP nanofibers. Purity and morphology of the synthesized material have been investigated by X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy techniques. Finally, LATP nanofibers have been used as ceramic filler to produce a poly(ethylene oxide)-based CPE. Its electrochemical performance are here discussed and compared to those of the equivalent nanoparticle-filled CPE and the plain polymer electrolyte. Preliminary data on a dense ceramic electrolyte achieved by pressing and then calcining the precursor membrane are here reported too. [1] J. Janek, W.G. Zeier, Nat. Energy 1 (2016) 16141 [2] T. Yang, J. Zheng, Q. Cheng, Y.-Y. Hu, C.K. Chan, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (2017) 21773–21780. [3] W. Liu, S.W. Lee, D. Lin, F. Shi, S. Wang, A.D. Sendek, Y. Cui, Nat. Energy 2 (2017) 17035. [4] Z. Wan, D. Lei, W. Yang, C. Liu, K. Shi, X. Hao, L. Shen, W. Lv, B. Li, Q.-H. Yang, F. Kang, Y.-B. He, Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 (2019) 1805301. [5] T. Yang, Z.D. Gordon, Y. Li, C.K. Chan, J. Phys. Chem. C 119 (2015) 14947–14953. [6] T. Yang, Y. Li, C.K. Chan, J. Power Sources 287 (2015) 164–169. [7] H. Aono, E. Sugimoto, Y. Sadaoka, N. Imanaka G. Adachi, J. Electrochem. Soc. 137 (1990) 1023–1027. [8] A. La Monaca, A. Paolella, A. Guerfi, F. Rosei, K. Zaghib, Electrochem. Commun. 104 (2019) 106483.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».