MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3025639549 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-01462647mtgabs

Nanostructured Mixed Transition Metal Spinel Oxide Thin Films As Efficient Electrocatalysts – Composition, Structure and Properties

2020· article· en· W3025639549 sur OpenAlexaff
Sreena Thekkoot, Rehana Islam, Sylvie Morin

Notice bibliographique

RevueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueCopper-based nanomaterials and applications
Établissements canadiensYork University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMaterials scienceSpinelCyclic voltammetryTransition metalOxideChemical engineeringThermal decompositionScanning electron microscopeElectrochemistryInorganic chemistryElectrodeCatalysisChemistryPhysical chemistryMetallurgyComposite material

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Transition metal oxides have received renewed attention with their demonstrated usefulness as cathodes in dye-sensitized solar cells and as anodes in fuel cell [1,2]. In addition, careful choice of the synthesis method and experimental conditions allow for the tailoring of the film nanostructure and surface area. However, it is clear from the literature [3,4] and our own work [5,6] that the experimental parameters used for the oxide material preparation can greatly affect its electrocatalytic properties and this often makes it difficult to compare material performances. We have prepared various spinel oxides, namely Cu x Co 3-x O 4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1), Ni 1-x Cu x Co 2 O 4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.75) and Fe y Ni x-y Co 3-x O 4 (for y = 0.1 and 0.15 and x = 1 and 0.5, respectively), on FTO glass using the thermal decomposition method. The films were analyzed, using several structural, chemical and electrochemical methods such as x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX), cyclic voltammetry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and electroreduction of hydrogen peroxide reaction were used as model reactions to determine the electrocatalytic activity of the electrodes. The SEM analysis shows that the prepared thin films are quite porous and uniform. EDX analysis shows that a good correlation exists between stoichiometric and the resulting composition of the films. Cu x Co 3-x O 4 materials shows a tendency for more copper to be incorporated in the films, while for Ni 1-x Cu x Co 2 O 4 , an excess of Co and a deficiency of Cu is observed. The formation of the spinel structure is confirmed by XRD analysis. For Cu x Co 3-x O 4 , an increase of the lattice parameter with increasing copper content was observed. This supports the incorporation of the copper in the spinel structure. However, the increase of the lattice-parameter was not linear due to the formation of copper oxide at higher copper concentrations. For the Ni 1-x Cu x Co 2 O 4 series, the X-ray data also support the existence of the spinel structure. Using the film's real surface area, as determined by capacitance measurements, it is possible to compare the properties of materials of different roughness. The addition of Cu to Co 3 O 4 to form Cu x Co 3-x O 4 resulted in an increase in roughness for x values from 0.25 to 1. When Ni is added to form the ternary oxides, the roughness more than doubles. For spinel oxides containing iron, nickel and cobalt, the roughness is much lower, i.e., around 80. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy was used extensively to understand cation site occupancy, composition and oxidation state of the metal ions in the ternary oxide materials. Our XPS data shows some differences between the bulk and surface compositions of our materials. The high-resolution spectra for the Co, Cu and Ni 2p peaks indicate the existence of different Co 2+ /Co 3+ , Cu + /Cu 2+ and Ni 2+ /Ni 3+ ratio for these materials. However, the amount of iron was often too small to be detected by XPS in iron containing samples with y ≤ 0.15. In general, the surface of the materials was found to be enriched with copper and deficient in cobalt. Larger Co 2+ /Co 3+ ratios are usually associated with better electrocatalytic properties towards OER. This points to the octahedral surface sites being the active sites. The analysis of O 1s spectra indicates that it is composed of three components that can be assigned to lattice oxygen, adsorbed oxygen containing species such as hydroxides and surface bonded water. During the presentation, our results will be compared to the morphology, structure, surface and bulk compositions, and electrochemical properties of spinel oxide films of similar compositions reported in the literature. References [1] W. Wang, X. Xu, Y. Liu, Y. Zhong, Z. Shao Adv. Energy Mater. 2018 , 8, 1800172 (1-24) [2] S. P.S. Shaikh, A. Muchtar, M. R. Somalu Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 2015 , 51, 1-8 [3] M. S. Burke, S. Zou, L. J. Enman, J. E. Kellon, C. A. Gabor, E. Pledger, W. Boettcher J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015 , 6, 3737−3742 [4] R.L. Doyle, I.J. Godwin, M.P. Brandon, M.E.G. Lyons, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013 , 15, 13737-13783. [5] S. Raju Thekkout, “Nanostructured mixed transition metal spinel oxide as efficient electrocatalysts” M.Sc. Thesis, York University, 2015 . [6] R. Islam, “Nanostructured ternary transition metal spinel oxide as efficient electrocatalysts” M.Sc. Thesis, York University, 2019 .

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,844

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueECS Meeting AbstractsMême sujetCopper-based nanomaterials and applicationsTravaux en français237 207