MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3025755514 · doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa608

Symptomatic Infants Have Higher Nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 Viral Loads but Less Severe Disease Than Older Children

2020· article· en· W3025755514 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Philip Zachariah, Katia C. Halabi, Candace Johnson, Susan Whitter, Jorge L. Sepulveda, Daniel A. Green

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRespiratory viral infections research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesSeqirusMichael Smith Health Research BCGlaxoSmithKlineBC Children's HospitalChildren's Hospital FoundationCanadian Child Health Clinician Scientist ProgramSanofiPfizer
Mots-clésSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)MedicineViral loadDiseaseCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pediatrics2019-20 coronavirus outbreakVirologyVirusInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Outbreak

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor—Published data suggest lower rates of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pediatric age groups [1, 2]. However, the relative contribution of infants and children to community transmission is not known. Data from China suggest that children were infected early in the outbreak [3]. A report published in this journal described the presence of a high nasopharyngeal (NP) viral load of severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a well infant [4]. Whether this observation is generalizable to symptomatic infants, and how it compares to NP viral loads in older children and adolescents, is not known. Studies in adults have demonstrated a positive correlation between viral load and COVID-19 severity [5]. While some data have suggested a higher disease severity in infants [2, 6], how NP viral load correlates with severity across the pediatric age spectrum has not been firmly established. Here we report NP viral load among infants, children, and adolescents who were hospitalized and discharged from our children’s hospital from 14 March to 24 April 2020. All patients were tested either in the emergency department or during inpatient hospitalization based on symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. For each patient, we extracted age, time from reported symptom onset to the date of test, and severity of disease during hospitalization. Severity of COVID-19 disease was determined by (1) the need for respiratory support with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and/or mechanical ventilation or (2) intensive care unit (ICU) admission. All testing was performed by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction with the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc, Branchburg, NJ). Cycle threshold (Ct) values, which are inversely proportional to viral RNA concentration, were used to measure relative viral loads. Target 2, a conserved region of the structural protein envelope E-gene, was used for these purposes as it was the most consistently amplified target. We used Student’s t tests to compare mean Ct values between age groups and Fisher’s exact tests to compare categorical variables. Among 57 patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, 20 (35.1%) were infants 12 months of age or younger. Older children and adolescents ranged from 1 year to 21 years of age. Mean NP viral load was significantly higher in infants as compared with older children and adolescents (mean Ct, 21.05 vs 27.25; P < .01) (Figure 1). However, a significantly lower proportion of infants had severe disease as compared with the older patients (n = 1 [5%] vs n = 12 [32.4%]; P = .02). Mean time to test positivity from symptom onset was lower in infants than older children (2 vs 3.8 days, P < .01). Similar proportions in both groups were tested within 7 days of symptom onset (91.2% vs 100%, P = .47). Nasopharyngeal swab viral loads and severity of disease compared across infants compared with older children. Abbreviation: Ct, cycle threshold. Our report suggests that symptomatic infants have higher NP viral loads at presentation but develop less severe disease as compared with older children and adolescents. Whether this is attributable to slightly earlier presentation to clinical care versus host biology requires investigation. These data have implications for mitigating spread, especially in congregate settings (eg, child care centers) or hospital units (eg, neonatal ICUs) that serve this group. Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,020

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,019
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,081
Tête enseignante GPT0,404
Écart entre enseignants0,323 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations25
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical Infectious DiseasesMême sujetRespiratory viral infections researchTravaux en français237 207