MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3025914743 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100384

The 2019-nCoV pandemic in the global south: A Tsunami ahead

2020· article· en· W3025914743 sur OpenAlexaff
Mônica Malta, Anne W. Rimoin, Nicole A. Hoff, Steffanie A. Strathdee

Notice bibliographique

RevueEClinicalMedicine · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPandemicMedicineGlobal healthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Personal protective equipmentPoliticsHealth careEconomic growthPublic relationsPublic healthPolitical scienceLawDiseaseNursingEconomicsInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, high-income countries have faced shortages of medical supplies, personal protective equipment (PPE), ICU beds and ventilators [1Ranney M.L. Griffeth V. Jha A.K. Critical supply shortages — the need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic.N Engl J Med. 2020; (10.1056/NEJMp2006141)Crossref PubMed Scopus (1386) Google Scholar]. In this unexpected scenario, physicians working in the world's richest nations have been left to decide who will receive mechanical ventilation and, ultimately, who lives and who dies. Most countries in the Global South have yet to experience a significant wave of COVID-19, but are predicted to follow a similar trajectory as the Global North. The recent decision of President Donald Trump to withdraw US financial support for the World Health Organization (WHO) will deeply affect its ability to provide critical humanitarian aid to countries with the weakest health systems in the world [2The New York Times. Trump halts world health organization funding amid coronavirus pandemic. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000007088432/trump-world-health-organization-coronavirus.html, 2020. Accessed May 8, 2020.Google Scholar]. The US decision may lead other nations to withdraw support and undermine WHO's efforts amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. This could lead to millions of additional preventable deaths directly and indirectly related to COVID-19 [3The Guardian. “US scuppers G20 coronavirus statement on strengthening WHO” Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/20/us-scuppers-g20-coronavirus-statement-on-strengthening-who, 2020. Acessed May 8, 2020.Google Scholar]. In contrast to earlier pandemics, in our globalized world where nations are closely interconnected, ripple effects of new waves of COVID-19 could impact not only the Global South, but worldwide. The unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has also influenced regional collaborations. One shocking example is the redirection of shipments of ventilators, PPE and medical supplies from resource-limited settings to richer countries [4Reuters. “U.S. coronavirus supply spree sparks outrage among allies” Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-masks/u-s-coronavirus-supply-spree-sparks-outrage-among-allies-idUSKBN21L253, 2020. Accessed May 8, 2020.Google Scholar]. Benefits of multilateralism might appear unidirectional from Global North to South, but this is a superficial assumption. The Ebola outbreaks and the HIV/AIDS pandemic, for example, demonstrated the importance of scientific collaborations between scientists from the Global South and North to respond to these global health threats [5Erondu N. & Agogo E.What factors will decide the fate of the global south in coronavirus pandemic?Available at https://theGlobalobservatory.org/2020/03/what-factors-will-decide-fate-Global-south-coronavirus-pandemic/, 2020. Accessed May 8, 2020.Google Scholar]. The response to the COVID-19 pandemic is deeply influenced by local, regional, national and global policies and political decisions. Some nations who adopted early containment measures, (e.g. school closures, widespread diagnostic testing) such as Germany experienced lower COVID-19 incidence and mortality [6Nussbaumer-Streit B. Mayr V. Dobrescu A.I. et al.Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 4CD013574PubMed Google Scholar]. However, those strategies might not be feasible or could have unintended consequences in the Global South. For example, India declared the biggest nationwide lockdown in the world, affecting 1.3 billion people and unleashing chaos across the country [7Menezes V. “India's leaders have panicked. Now the millions who power the country are suffering” Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/08/india-leaders-coronavirus-lockdown, 2020. Acessed May 8, 2020.Google Scholar]. The total shutdown of public transportation forced millions into makeshift shelters or open fields, where they rely on public toilets and food handouts, making key strategies such as hand hygiene and social distancing impossible [7Menezes V. “India's leaders have panicked. Now the millions who power the country are suffering” Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/08/india-leaders-coronavirus-lockdown, 2020. Acessed May 8, 2020.Google Scholar]. In Brazil, more than 14 million people live in crowded slums lacking basic sanitation where tuberculosis and Zika have flourished. Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, has downplayed COVID-19 as a ‘little flu’ and recently fired his Minister of Health after disagreeing about the need to adopt social distancing. The country has the highest number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in Latin America and has yet to declare a national lockdown [8Darlington S. & Kottasová I. “Brazil president Bolsonaro replaces health minister” Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/16/americas/brazil-health-minister-fired-intl/index.html, 2020. Accessed May 8, 2020.Google Scholar]. According to the International Rescue Committee [9International Rescue Committee. COVID-19 in humanitarian crises: a double emergency. Available at: https://www.rescue.org/sites/default/files/document/4693/covid-19-doubleemergency-april2020.pdf, 2020. Acessed May 8, 2020.Google Scholar], South Sudan only has four ventilators and 24 ICU beds for 12 million inhabitants. Similar scenarios exist in Northeast Syria (11 ventilators), Sierra Leone (13 ventilators), among others. In Venezuela, 90% of hospitals lack critical supplies and in Yemen, 18 million people do not have access to proper hygiene, water and sanitation [9International Rescue Committee. COVID-19 in humanitarian crises: a double emergency. Available at: https://www.rescue.org/sites/default/files/document/4693/covid-19-doubleemergency-april2020.pdf, 2020. Acessed May 8, 2020.Google Scholar]. In these fragile and conflict-affected countries, there is not enough resources to increase the availability of hospitals, healthcare professionals, ICU beds or ventilators in time to respond to COVID-19. These regions need assistance to urgently adopt public health measures to strengthen case identification, contact tracing, isolation, quarantine, social distancing, hand hygiene and PPE. The Global South needs humanitarian support now. But the Global North can (and should) learn from successful public health strategies adopted by the most vulnerable countries in the world. Liberia and Sierra Leone, for example, already experienced quarantine and school closures for extended periods [10Nyenswah T.G. Kateh F. Bawo L. et al.Ebola and its control in Liberia, 2014-2015.Emerg Infect Dis. 2016; 22: 169-177Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar]. Brazil controlled a recent Zika epidemic and offers free/universal prevention and treatment to HIV/AIDS. Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, global collaboration is key and should include data sharing, equitable distribution of resources, novel treatments and vaccines. Successful experiences and lessons learned from previous public health responses to SARS, H1N1, Ebola, HIV/AIDS should be amplified and adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic [5Erondu N. & Agogo E.What factors will decide the fate of the global south in coronavirus pandemic?Available at https://theGlobalobservatory.org/2020/03/what-factors-will-decide-fate-Global-south-coronavirus-pandemic/, 2020. Accessed May 8, 2020.Google Scholar]. Responses should be coordinated to achieve a sustainable aim: to control the pandemic regionally, nationally and globally.20 To fight this pandemic (and future global threats), nations should adopt strategies and approaches emphasizing that “We are all in this together.” The US should renew its support to WHO: the pandemic will not be over anywhere until it is over everywhere. MM conceived, drafted the manuscript and coordinated subsequent edits and revisions. AWR, NAH and SAS participated in drafting the manuscript and its finalization. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. There was no funding source for this study.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,512
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,168
Tête enseignante GPT0,475
Écart entre enseignants0,307 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEClinicalMedicineMême sujetCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsTravaux en français237 207