MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3026419347

Design of a coin roll check weighing system

2012· article· en· W3026419347 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueTransport Systems and Technology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The purpose of this report is to detail the design and analysis of a coin roll check weighing system for the Royal Canadian Mint. The intent of this system is to check the number of coins per wrapped roll, reject if needed, and output onto the tiling machine conveyor. This system is required due to newly contracted coin production that requires coin rolls to check weighed. For our design, we choose to solve this problem, using off-the-shelf components and prototyped models. To begin the check weighing system design, we recommended using the original attachments on the current four wrapping machines. After this attachment, our team prototyped a roll reorientation slide and buffer mechanism. The re-orientation slide rotates the rolls 90° and outputs them onto the buffer attachments. Once the roll is queued on the buffer attachment a buffer drop mechanism is used to output a single when signalled by a photoelectric sensor along the main conveyor. These sensors detect openings along the belt between the four wrappers for coin rolls to be dropped. We recommend using the E3H2 Miniature photoelectric sensors from Omron to complete this task. After the roll is dropped, it will begin moving towards the check weighing station. To complete this motion, two narrow flat belt conveyors from Mini Mover Conveyors were selected. These conveyors consist of a horizontal main conveyor under the buffer mechanism and an inclined conveyor to carry the roll up to the check weighing station. To ensure the rolls maintain the correct orientation during transport, adjustable side rail guides from Mini Mover Conveyors were selected. In order to optimize the use of the conveyors with different sized rolls, each conveyor section was fitted with a variable speed drive motor, also from Mini Mover Conveyors. In order check weigh each coin roll after wrapping, an Ishida DASC-G-S015-12-SS check weigher was selected. This check weigher is able to process up to 400 items per minute with accuracy of 0.1 grams. These specifications, along with others, are more than adequate for the Mint requirements. Not only does this system include check weighing but also user defined software and a rejection system. Since these components are all integrated into a single station, the check weighing machine is capable of recording weighing data and outputting in RS232 format. The rejection system is also capable of not only rejecting faulty rolls, but also alerting the operator and stopping the process after 10 consecutive rolls have been rejected. Following the check weighing the station, the coin rolls travel onto a final alignment conveyor, where similar used on the main and inclined conveyor, that re-aligns the coin rolls for the roll transfer attachment. This conveyor, guides, and motor were obtained from Mini Mover Conveyors as well. Finally, after the rolls have been re-aligned, they are dropped onto the tiling conveyor using a prototype roll transfer attachment. This attachment is designed to be adjusted for different roll diameters and lengths to ensure the correct roll orientation onto the tiling conveyor. Lastly, a cost analysis was performed for procuring the commercially available components and manufacturing the prototype components. The total cost of the system came out to be $62.441.86. It should be noted that this cost does not included prototype development and setup costs. This constraint, along with the floor space size, output height, and power methods were all met with our system. The total floor space size for our designed check weighing system was 5.46 feet long by 2.2 feet wide and the output height to the tiling conveyor is 34.75 inches from the roll transfer attachment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,166
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,460

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,155
Écart entre enseignants0,142 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle