S221. THE EFFICACY OF LUMATEPERONE 42 MG IN THE TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA SYMPTOMS ASSOCIATED WITH SOCIAL FUNCTIONING: POST HOC ANALYSIS OF AN ACUTE PLACEBO- AND ACTIVE-CONTROLLED TRIAL
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Deficits in social functioning are a core feature of schizophrenia and may be due to the interaction of multiple factors including negative symptoms, depression symptoms, and deficits in social cognition. Social and functional impairment in schizophrenia can be difficult to treat, may not correlate with improvements in psychotic symptoms, and has been associated with poor long-term patient outcomes. Lumateperone (lumateperone tosylate, ITI-007) is a mechanistically novel agent for the treatment of schizophrenia that simultaneously modulates serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate neurotransmission. Lumateperone was shown to be efficacious and well tolerated in 2 acute placebo-controlled studies and its safety and effectiveness was further supported in a long-term open-label study. The effects of lumateperone 42 mg (ITI-007 60 mg) on schizophrenia symptoms associated with social function were investigated in a post hoc analysis of a study that included risperidone 4 mg as an active control (Study 005, NCT01499563). Symptoms associated with social functioning were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-derived Prosocial factor (PANSS items P3, P6, N2, N4, N7, G16), which has been utilized previously to evaluate the efficacy of various antipsychotics on this functional domain. Methods This is a post hoc analysis of data from a positive placebo- and active-controlled study in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Change from baseline in the PANSS Prosocial factor was assessed in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in patients with prominent negative symptoms (PNS, score ≥4 on at least 3 negative symptom items) or moderate-to-severe depression symptoms (Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia [CDSS] ≥6) at baseline. Inferential analysis was conducted using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM). Results The ITT population comprised 231 patients (placebo, n=80; lumateperone 42 mg, n=76; risperidone 4 mg, n=75); the PNS and CDSS ≥6 populations comprised 110 and 54 patients, respectively. Lumateperone 42-mg treatment was associated with significantly greater improvement compared with placebo on the PANSS Prosocial factor (least-squares mean difference [LSMD] vs placebo = −2.7; P<.001). Risperidone also was superior to placebo on the PANSS Prosocial factor (LSMD= −1.8; P=.011). Similar treatment effects for lumateperone 42 mg were seen on the PANSS Prosocial factor in patients with PNS at baseline (LSMD −2.6, P=.006). Conversely, in patients with PNS, risperidone treatment showed small and non-significant treatment effects on the PANSS Prosocial factor (LSMD= −0.4; P=.707). In patients with moderate-to-severe depression symptoms at baseline, marked and significant improvements on the PANSS Prosocial factor were seen in lumateperone-treated patients (LSMD= −4.9; P<.001) but not in risperidone-treated patients (LSMD=−1.3; P=.397). Discussion Lumateperone 42 mg significantly improved schizophrenia symptoms related to social functioning. In contrast to risperidone, lumateperone was associated with similar or greater treatment effects on the PANSS Prosocial factor in patients with prominent negative symptoms or moderate-to-severe depression symptoms at baseline. These results suggest that lumateperone may have benefits on schizophrenia symptoms associated with social function.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».