S157. A MULTICENTER HARMONIZED DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING STUDY ON THE ASSOCIATION OF WHITE MATTER STRUCTURE AND CLINICAL FUNCTIONING
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background The association of white matter (WM) abnormalities with clinical variables in schizophrenia (SCZ) is poorly understood. We investigated the clinical correlates of WM impairments using imaging data of 597 patients with SCZ and 490 healthy controls (HC). We focused on lifelong changes of WM (measured by Fractional Anisotropy [FA]) in SCZ and compared it to that of HC. We investigated how age, duration of illness, and medication influence WM trajectories, and examined how structural impairments are related to symptoms and cognition. Last, we tested for the role of sex in structure-function interactions. Methods Diffusion-weighted images and clinical measurements were collected as part of 13 independent studies, and data was harmonized across all sites. We registered images to the IIT Human Brain Atlas and averaged FA for forceps major, forceps minor, cingulum, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and uncinate fasciculus. First, we modeled the FA age trajectory of each tract in HC and used it to regress out the effect of age in patients. The residuals in the FA values were utilized for further analyses. We conducted mediator regression analyses with FA as the dependent variable, sex as a covariate, and age and duration of illness as the independent variables. Next, patients were grouped based on Chlorpromazine equivalent dosage (CPZ) and CPZ group was added to the regression model. To examine the association between structure and function, a structural equation model (SEM) was used, with cognition as a mediator. Last, all analyses were repeated for males and females separately. Results Regression analyses revealed a significant influence of duration of illness on the forceps major (T=3.24, p<.001), forceps minor (T=3.40, p<.001), and SLF (T=3.83, p<.0001). When adding both age and duration of illness, duration of illness mediated the influence of age on FA. Adding CPZ to the model displayed a significant effect of medication on forceps major (T=3.93, p<.0001). For SEM, FA of all tracts was used to represent structural impairment, and symptom scores were used to reflect functional impairment. All data paths were calculated with an asymptotically distribution-free model. The overall model fit was acceptable (RMSEA =.09) with a medium-strong effect of structural impairment on functional impairment (standardized estimate=.44). When separating sexes, males showed a significant association of duration of illness and FA. Females displayed a stronger influence of structural impairment on functional impairment (standardized estimate: males = .29, females =.52), and cognition had an impact on this relationship for females only. Discussion The effect of duration of illness on specific WM tracts suggests a progressive, neurodegenerative pathology, which might contribute to the devastating effects of chronicity. Medication seems to have only a small, localized effect on corpus callosum WM integrity. However, since our analysis used cross-sectional CPZ measures, future studies should include measurements of lifetime dosage. The observed impact of WM abnormalities on function further highlights the importance of WM for SCZ pathology. The association of structure and function seems sex-specific. Men show a stronger effect of chronicity. For females, cognition mediates the effect of structure on function, suggesting the role of cognitive reserve. Our approach provides the first step towards evidence-based medicine, by demonstrating the apparent relationship between structural pathology and functional outcome and suggesting possible mediators of this relationship, including duration of illness, cognition, medication, and sex.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».